rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · 2016

PRS-GO Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2016

Reinserting the Hump in Primary Rhinoplasty: The Gain Is Three-fold

Constantinidis J, Fyrmpas G.

What this paper says

In 62 patients, the removed dorsal hump was reshaped and put back between the upper lateral cartilages to rebuild the middle of the nose, with a satisfactory result in all but 3 over a mean follow-up of 13 months.

Overview

Removing a hump leaves the middle third of the nose unsupported, which can later cause a pinched look and blocked breathing. Instead of using separate cartilage grafts to rebuild it, the authors reuse the hump they just removed. The technique combines placing the modified hump between the upper lateral cartilages with bridging sutures between those cartilages.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective review of primary aesthetic rhinoplasty patients undergoing hump resection.
  • 62 patients enrolled: 46 with a straight nose and 16 with a deviated nose.
  • 23 were operated through an open approach and 39 through a closed approach.
  • Osteotomies were needed in 56 of the 62 patients.
  • Mean follow-up 13 months, range 9 to 16 months.
  • A satisfactory result was achieved in all but 3 patients, who had visible irregularities; 2 needed minimal rasping under local anesthesia and 1 declined further treatment.
  • The technique is described as a modification of Skoog's original technique.
  • The authors state the reinserted hump acts as both a spreader and an onlay graft, and the sutures increase the nasal valve angle while preventing displacement.

What it means for a patient

  • Tissue removed from the bridge can be reused as the support graft, avoiding harvest from the septum, ear, or rib.
  • Stated indications are a straight or mildly deviated nose, and a long thin-skinned nose with short nasal bones.
  • The technique worked through both the open and the closed approach in this series.
  • Limits: retrospective, 62 patients, single group with no comparison to spreader grafts or flaps, and mean follow-up of about 1 year, which is short for judging late irregularities.

Why this paper matters

Middle vault reconstruction after hump removal normally consumes donor cartilage, and this offers an alternative supply. Whether it holds contour as well as spreader grafts over many years is not tested here.

Terms

  • Dorsal hump: The bump of bone and cartilage on the bridge of the nose.
  • Middle vault: The middle third of the nose, between the bony bridge and the tip.
  • Upper lateral cartilage: The paired cartilage forming the sidewall of the middle nose.
  • Spreader graft: A cartilage strip placed alongside the septum to support the middle vault.
  • Rasping: Filing down a small bony or cartilage irregularity.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Hump reduction in aesthetic rhinoplasty destabilizes the middle vault. Secondary maneuvers are necessary to avoid the long-term functional and aesthetic sequelae of middle vault collapse. We describe a new technique of reinserting the resected hump that combines (a) placement of the modified hump between the upper laterals and (b) bridging sutures between the upper laterals.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing primary aesthetic rhinoplasty with hump resection.

Results: Sixty-two patients, 46 with a straight and 16 with a deviated nose, enrolled. Twenty-three patients were operated through an open approach and 39 through a closed approach. Osteotomies were necessary in 56 patients. Mean follow-up was 13 months (range, 9-16 mo). A satisfactory result was achieved in all but 3 patients who had visible irregularities. Two of them required minimal rasping under local anesthesia and the third patient refused any further treatment.

Conclusions: Our modification of Skoog's original technique has certain advantages: the hump acts as a spreader and onlay graft, which preserves the natural dorsal lines. The sutures increase the nasal valve angle while preventing displacement of the reinserted hump. Indications include a straight or mildly deviated nose, a long thin-skinned nose with short nasal bones. The technique is also feasible through the closed or open approach and offers a valuable alternative to spreader grafts or flaps.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Year
2016
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2016.

  1. ASJ
    2016PMID 27069244
  2. ASJ
    2016PMID 26879296Summary
  3. ASJ
    2016PMID 27069245
  4. ASJ
    2016PMID 26545389Summary
  5. FPS
    2016PMID 27494581Summary
  6. PRS-GO
    2016PMID 27482503Summary