Journal archive · Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2020
Non-surgical Rhinoplasty with Hyaluronic acid Fillers: Predictable Results Using Software for the Evaluation of Nasal Angles
Santorelli A, Marlino S.
What this paper says
Across 62 patients treated with a mean 0.55 mL of hyaluronic acid filler, the nasofrontal angle rose by 3.7 degrees and satisfaction from 2.4 to 9.4 out of 10, with minor transient complications in under 5 percent.
Overview
Evidence on which filler products and techniques suit the nose is limited. This prospective single-center study treated the bridge and the strip between the nostrils with two specific hyaluronic acid products and measured the resulting angle changes using free software.
Sections of note
- Prospective, open-label, single-center study of consecutive adults treated in the bony and cartilaginous bridge and the columella with VYC-20 or VYC-17.5; maximum 1 mL used.
- All patients except one had at least 12 months of follow-up.
- 62 patients enrolled, 57 female and 5 male; mean age 29.0 years SD 9.2.
- Mean filler injected at first treatment 0.55 mL SD 0.22, range 0.2 to 1.0 mL; 12 patients required a touch-up of 0.15 mL SD 0.08.
- Mean nasofrontal angle rose from 143.6 degrees SD 6.3 to 147.3 SD 6.7, a change of 3.7 SD 2.8.
- Mean nasolabial angle rose from 85.3 degrees SD 6.1 to 88.5 SD 6.1, a change of 3.2 SD 2.6.
- Satisfaction on a 0 to 10 scale rose from 2.4 SD 1.7 to 9.4 SD 0.8; complications were minor and transient: pain 3 (4.8%), swelling 3 (4.8%), bruise 2 (3.2%). Level of evidence IV.
What it means for a patient
- Small filler volumes, around half a millilitre, produced measurable angle changes of roughly 3 to 4 degrees.
- Roughly 1 in 5 patients needed a small top-up.
- No serious vascular complications occurred in this series, though the nose carries that recognized risk.
- Limits: 62 patients, one center, no comparison group, and satisfaction measured on an unvalidated 0 to 10 scale.
Why this paper matters
Nasal filler outcomes are usually described rather than measured, and this pairs angle measurement with product and volume specifics. Twelve months of follow-up addresses duration, which most filler papers omit. The absence of a control group and of a validated satisfaction instrument limits the conclusions.
Terms
- Hyaluronic acid filler: An injectable gel that can be dissolved with an enzyme if needed.
- Nasofrontal angle: The angle between the forehead and the bridge of the nose.
- Nasolabial angle: The angle between the base of the nose and the upper lip.
- Columella: The strip of tissue between the nostrils.
- Open-label: A study in which participants and investigators know what treatment is given.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“There is a relative lack of evidence on optimal products and techniques for nose treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of nasal reshaping with Vycross HA fillers, using a free software (Face Master) to measure facial parameters. Methods: This was a prospective,…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty
88 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2020.
- ASJ Analysis of the Effects of Isotretinoin on Rhinoplasty PatientsYahyavi S, Jahandideh H, Izadi M et al.2020PMID 32756944Summary
- ASJ 2020PMID 32232381
- ASJ Concept of Anatomic Columellar Strut Grafting in Rhinoplasty: An Algorithmic ApproachSantareno S, Taş S2020PMID 31675056
- ASJ Step-Specific Simulation: The Utility of 3D Printing for the Fabrication of a Low-Cost, Learning Needs-Based Rhinoplasty SimulatorZammit D, Safran T, Ponnudurai N et al.2020PMID 32064498Summary
- ASJ The Value of Averageness in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Humans Like Average Nosesvan Zijl FVWJ, Perrett DI, Lohuis PJFM et al.2020PMID 31960890Summary
- APS A Comparative Analysis of Patients' Quality of Life, Body Image and Self-confidence Before and After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty SurgeryBorujeni LA, Pourmotabed S, Abdoli Z et al.2020PMID 31832733Summary
- APS Analysis of Nasal Obstruction Patterns Following Reductive RhinoplastyOkland TS, Kandathil C, Sanan A et al.2020PMID 31463565Summary
- APS Correction to: The Role of Skin Thickness in the Choice of a Rhinoplasty Technique for Thin-Skinned Patients: Analysis of Long-Term Results and Patient SatisfactionBarone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R et al.2020PMID 32514639Summary