Journal archive · Complications and management · 2020
Complications in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review and Comparison with a Survey of Consent Forms
Heilbronn C, Cragun D, Wong BJF.
What this paper says
Comparing 117 published studies against 24 rhinoplasty consent forms, dissatisfaction and revision were among the top five reported complications yet appeared in only 83.3 and 75.0 percent of consent forms.
Overview
Informed consent for rhinoplasty is difficult because the operation has many possible complications. This study identified complication rates from the published literature, catalogued what consent forms actually cover, and compared the two directly.
Sections of note
- Literature review of rhinoplasty articles from January 2000 to November 2017 with at least 100 patients, to identify complications and their rates.
- A comprehensive online search identified rhinoplasty consent forms and their topics.
- 117 articles were included, reporting 36 different complications.
- 24 consent forms were evaluated, yielding 80 different topics.
- Common complications in the literature: skin problems such as acne 18.3 percent, numbness 16.7 percent, hospital revisit 6.5 percent, primary source revision rate 5.3 percent, dissatisfaction 5.0 percent.
- Most commonly covered consent topics: infection 100 percent, bleeding 95.8 percent, scarring 95.8 percent.
- Unsatisfactory results were covered in 83.3 percent of forms and need for revision in 75.0 percent, despite both being in the top five complications reported.
What it means for a patient
- The most frequent problems reported in studies are skin changes and numbness, not the infection and bleeding that consent forms emphasize.
- One in four consent forms did not mention the possibility of needing a revision operation.
- Published revision rates in this analysis were around 5.3 percent and dissatisfaction 5.0 percent.
- Limits: 24 consent forms found online, and complication rates pooled from studies of varying design and definition.
Why this paper matters
Consent forms shape what patients expect, and this shows a mismatch between what they emphasize and what actually happens most often. Dissatisfaction and revision are the outcomes patients care about and the ones most often omitted. The analysis describes the gap without testing whether closing it changes expectations.
Terms
- Informed consent: The process of ensuring a patient understands the risks before agreeing to surgery.
- Complication rate: The proportion of patients experiencing a given adverse event.
- Revision rate: The proportion of patients needing a further operation.
- Consent form: The document listing risks a patient signs before surgery.
- Literature review: A structured survey of what has been published on a topic.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Informed consent in rhinoplasty is a challenging process due to the technically demanding surgery with a wide array of potential complications. Objective: To underscore the significance of informed consent in rhinoplasty, its complications, and identify gaps in the consent process. Design, Setting, and Participants:…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2020.
- ASJ Commentary on: The Effect of Autologous Fat Grafting on Edema and Ecchymoses in Primary Open RhinoplastyManafi A, Manafi N2020PMID 31886850
- ASJ The Effect of Autologous Fat Grafting on Edema and Ecchymoses in Primary Open RhinoplastyGabrick K, Walker M, Timberlake A et al.2020PMID 30868159Summary
- APS Clinical Features of Skin Infection After Rhinoplasty with Only Absorbable Thread (Polydioxanone) in Oriental Traditional Medicine: A Case Series StudyKim HJ, Lee SJ, Lee JH et al.2020PMID 31797043Summary
- APS Effect of Photobiomodulation on Ecchymosis after Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled TrialKarimi S, Sadeghi M, Amali A et al.2020PMID 32410200Summary
- APS Efficacy of Dexamethasone for Reducing Edema and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisBian X, Liu H, Sun J et al.2020PMID 32383002Summary
- APS 2020PMID 32514638
- FPS 2020PMID 33368076Summary
- FPS 2020PMID 33368077Summary