Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A User-Friendly, Practical Roadmap to the Planning and Execution of Every Rhinoplasty-A 5-Year Review
Robotti E, Daniel RK, Leone F.
What this paper says
A five year single centre review arguing that cone beam CT is a practical planning tool for every rhinoplasty, showing septum, turbinates, nasal bones and skin thickness before surgery.
Overview
Cone beam computed tomography has spread as a convenient alternative to conventional CT for imaging the face and jaws, but the authors state most rhinoplasty surgeons in both plastic surgery and ear, nose and throat practice are unfamiliar with it. The paper reviews one centre's clinical experience with it over five years and analyses its applications in first time and revision surgery.
Sections of note
- Review of a single centre's broad clinical experience over five years; no patient numbers or outcome data are reported in the abstract.
- Applications analysed include the septum, turbinates, nasal bones, skin thickness and other issues.
- The authors argue for a shift from two dimensional to three dimensional image reconstruction, and for surface contour enhancement.
- The surface image is said to strengthen aesthetic analysis.
- Detailed preview of bony and functional anatomy is said to facilitate surgical planning.
- Spatial views and easy accurate measuring are given as further advantages.
- The stated drawbacks are limited to radiation exposure and cost.
What it means for a patient
- Cone beam CT gives a three dimensional picture of the bone and airway before surgery rather than relying on examination alone.
- It involves radiation exposure, which the authors acknowledge as a drawback.
- No outcomes are reported, so there is no evidence here that imaging improves surgical results.
- Claims of more predictable and efficient surgery are the authors' assessment.
Why this paper matters
Preoperative imaging is not routine in rhinoplasty, and the decision rests on whether the added information changes surgical planning enough to justify radiation and cost. This review makes the case for routine use. Whether outcomes differ with or without imaging has not been tested.
Terms
- Cone beam computed tomography: a three dimensional scan using a cone shaped X ray beam, common in dental and facial imaging.
- Turbinates: the shelves of tissue inside the nose that warm and filter air.
- Maxillofacial: relating to the jaws and face.
- Surface contour enhancement: processing an image to show the shape of the skin surface.
- Radiation exposure: the dose of X rays a patient receives during imaging.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Cone-beam computed tomography has recently rapidly developed worldwide as a versatile and convenient alternative to traditional computed tomography for imaging of the maxillofacial region. However, most surgeons performing rhinoplasty are surprisingly unfamiliar with it, in both the plastic surgery and ear, nose, and…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2021
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2011 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2021.
- PRS Component Restoration in the Bilateral Intermediate Cleft Tip RhinoplastyDang BN, Pfaff MJ, Jain NS et al.2021PMID 34398093Summary
- PRS Differences between Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: Indications, Techniques, Grafts, and OutcomesHacker S, Pollock J, Gubisch W et al.2021PMID 34270514Summary
- PRS 2021PMID 33890888
- PRS 2021PMID 34550929
- PRS Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Rhinoplasty: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure SetManahan MA, Fedok F, Davidson C et al.2021PMID 33235037Summary
- PRS Flexible Tongue-in-Groove Technique and Its Effectiveness Compared to Classic Tongue-in-Groove and Columellar Strut Graft Techniques: A Retrospective Analysis of 237 Open Rhinoplasty CasesErdal AI, Genç İG, Pasinlioğlu B et al.2021PMID 34644278Summary
- PRS How Should the Cellphone Be Used to Obtain Good Pictures for Rhinoplasty?Jaber A, Saghir M, Fernandez-Pellon R et al.2021PMID 34233343
- PRS Laser-Assisted Rhinoplasty: The Future Generation Rhinoplasty Technique to Preserve Anatomy? A Series of Patients Compared to Patients Undergoing Standard Open RhinoplastyBertossi D, Marchetti A, Sbarbati A et al.2021PMID 33565827Summary