Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2021
A Practical Classification System for Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Techniques
Gonçalves Ferreira M, Toriumi DM.
What this paper says
A viewpoint article proposing a single classification that organizes all dorsal preservation techniques, old and new, so that similar procedures can be compared.
Overview
The authors state that preservation rhinoplasty, and dorsal preservation in particular, is among the most discussed and most confusing topics in modern rhinoplasty. Meetings and publications have driven interest in these old and new techniques. Newer preservation strategies have wider indications than the original push down and let down. The authors argue a simple classification is needed to clarify what preservation means.
Sections of note
- Viewpoint article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no outcomes and no follow up.
- The authors note new preservation strategies have a broader range of indications than the older push down and let down.
- They pose the question of whether all preservation variations can be systematized in a simple classification, and answer yes.
- The proposed classification is stated to cover all kinds of preservation techniques, both old and new.
- Classifying preservation is said to clarify the relative position of all techniques.
- The stated purpose is to allow comparison of procedures from similar families, and of their outcomes and indications.
What it means for a patient
- The number of named preservation techniques has grown faster than the evidence comparing them.
- A shared classification is a prerequisite for comparing results across studies.
- This article proposes a framework. It reports no clinical data.
Why this paper matters
Comparing outcomes between preservation techniques has been difficult because different names describe overlapping operations. A classification is the step that makes such comparison possible. Whether this particular scheme is adopted, and whether it improves outcome research, is not yet known.
Terms
- Dorsal preservation: lowering the natural nasal bridge instead of cutting the hump off.
- Push down: lowering the nasal framework into the face after releasing it.
- Let down: lowering the framework after removing a wedge of bone at each side.
- Classification system: an agreed scheme for grouping related techniques.
- Indication: the situation in which a particular technique is appropriate.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Preservation rhinoplasty in general and dorsal preservation in particular are for sure one of the most attractive topics in modern rhinoplasty and probably the most puzzling concept in this field. Recent major meetings and many other publications have led to an increased interest in these old/new techniques. New…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2021.
- ASJ 2021PMID 33141889
- ASJ Expanding Indications for Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty With Cartilage Conversion TechniquesKosins AM2021PMID 32185397Summary
- ASJ Reducing Dorsal Hump Recurrence Following Push Down-Let Down RhinoplastyTuncel U, Aydogdu IO, Kurt A2021PMID 32492137Summary
- ASJ Rhinoplasty: Aesthetic Augmentation With Improvement of Dorsal Aesthetic LinesZholtikov V, Golovatinskii V, Ouerghi R et al.2021PMID 33674857Summary
- APS 2021PMID 33469699
- APS 2021PMID 33399951Summary
- FPS 120 Years of Dorsal Preservation in RhinoplastyNg CL, D'Souza AR2021PMID 33621986Summary
- FPS Avoiding Aesthetic Drawbacks and Stigmata in Dorsal Line Preservation RhinoplastyNeves JC, Arancibia-Tagle D2021PMID 33648013Summary