Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · 2022
SELF: A Novel Algorithm for Deciding the Position of Lateral Osteotomies in Rhinoplasty Patients with Minimal External Deviation
Cabbarzade C.
What this paper says
Applying a four parameter algorithm in 521 patients to decide where to place the side bone cuts, 401 received double lateral and 85 high lateral osteotomies, with no serious complications reported.
Overview
Techniques for cutting the nasal bones date back decades, but little has been written about deciding the position of those cuts on each side. The author states the decision is usually made by looking at the face from the front and by feel, which is difficult in slightly crooked noses. The SELF algorithm uses four related parameters instead.
Sections of note
- Case series of 521 patients; the journal assigns level of evidence IV.
- Four hundred and ninety three patients were female and 28 male, aged 18 to 59 years.
- The four parameters are septal position at the nasal floor, external alar length, lateral pyramidal length and the side on which the frontal deviation starts.
- After evaluating those, either a double lateral or a high lateral osteotomy was performed on the side judged to have the longer bony wall.
- Four hundred and one double lateral and 85 high lateral osteotomies were performed.
- No serious functional or aesthetic complications related to the osteotomies were encountered.
- The author states the nasal tissues develop in relation to one another, which links these four parameters.
What it means for a patient
- The bone cuts that narrow or straighten the nose can be placed differently on each side, and the choice affects the result in a slightly crooked nose.
- The algorithm gives a repeatable basis for that choice rather than relying on inspection and feel.
- The stated outcome is the absence of serious complications, with no measurement of whether the noses ended up straighter.
- This is a single surgeon series with no comparison group.
Why this paper matters
Osteotomy placement is decided quickly during surgery and rarely documented, yet asymmetric placement is one route to a persistently crooked result. This paper proposes measurable criteria for it. Whether the algorithm produces straighter noses than judgment alone has not been tested.
Terms
- Lateral osteotomy: a bone cut along the side of the nose used to narrow or straighten it.
- Double lateral osteotomy: two cuts on the same side at different levels.
- High lateral osteotomy: a cut placed higher on the side wall.
- Bony pyramid: the bony upper part of the nasal framework.
- Alar length: the length of the nostril wing.
- Nasal floor: the base of the nasal cavity, where the septum meets the palate.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Although the different techniques and instruments described for lateral osteotomies date back decades, the literature on deciding the position of lateral osteotomies between the sides is limited. In general, the position of lateral osteotomies is decided by frontal view and palpation, but this is not always easy,…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Commentary on: Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyMost SP2022PMID 34546291
- ASJ Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyEravci FC, Özer H, Arbağ H et al.2022PMID 34436559Summary
- APS Closed Piezo Preservation RhinoplastyAlmazov I, Rovira RV, Farhadov V2022PMID 35169916Summary
- APS 2022PMID 35299264
- APS Piezo-Assisted Dorsal Preservation in Rhinoplasty: When and WhyTaglialatela Scafati S, Regalado-Briz A2022PMID 33987697Summary
- CPS Combining Open Structural and Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyPatel PN, Most SP2022PMID 34782143Summary
- FPSAM 2022PMID 35559727
- FPSAM Clinical Outcomes in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Meta-AnalysisTham T, Bhuiya S, Wong A et al.2022PMID 35172105Summary