Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Dorsum and hump · 2022
Using the Autospreaders as a Cutting Guide for Component Hump Reduction in Rhinoplasty
Al Jassim A, Moubayed SP.
What this paper says
A technique article using the patient's own upper cartilages as both a folded flap and a cutting guide during conventional hump removal, aimed at avoiding the hump recurrence seen with preservation techniques.
Overview
Dorsal preservation techniques have been popularized as a way to address a hump without disrupting the middle of the nose or cutting the bridge away. The authors state the drawback of those techniques is a higher rate of hump recurrence, up to 15 percent. They present an alternative using the upper lateral cartilages as a turn in flap and as a guide for the cut during classic hump takedown.
Sections of note
- Technique article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no outcomes, no complication rates and no follow up.
- Dorsal preservation is stated to carry hump recurrence rates of up to 15 percent.
- The upper lateral cartilages are used as a turn in flap and as a cutting guide.
- The cutting guide is stated to provide the correct dorsal angulation.
- It is also stated to dictate the amount of resection needed.
- The claimed results are pleasing dorsal lines, avoidance of dorsal irregularities and decreased risk of hump recurrence.
What it means for a patient
- This is conventional hump removal, not preservation, with the cartilage used to control how much is cut.
- Folding the same cartilage inward afterward keeps the airway from narrowing, avoiding a separate graft.
- The 15 percent recurrence figure cited for preservation is higher than the pooled figures reported elsewhere.
- No results are reported for this technique, so its claimed advantages are untested.
Why this paper matters
Hump recurrence is the main criticism of preservation rhinoplasty, and this article proposes returning to conventional removal with better control over the cut. It positions technique against philosophy. Whether it reduces recurrence or irregularity has not been measured.
Terms
- Autospreader: the patient's own upper cartilages folded inward to keep the airway open.
- Turn in flap: cartilage folded inward rather than removed.
- Component hump reduction: taking the hump down in separate bone and cartilage steps.
- Dorsal preservation: lowering the natural bridge instead of cutting the hump off.
- Hump recurrence: the bump becoming visible again after surgery.
- Midvault: the middle third of the nose between the bony bridge and the tip.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Dorsal preservation techniques as a means of addressing the dorsal hump have been popularized recently to avoid midvault disruption or dorsal resection. The pitfall of these techniques is the higher rate of dorsal hump recurrence of up to 15%. We present the use of the upper lateral cartilages (ULCs) as a turn-in flap and as a cutting guide during classic dorsal hump takedown. The cutting guide provides the perfect dorsal angulation and dictates the amount of resection needed. This translates to aesthetically pleasing dorsal lines, avoidance of dorsal irregularities, and decreased risk of hump recurrence.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
242 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2022.
- ASJ Commentary on: Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyMost SP2022PMID 34546291
- ASJ Computed Tomography Analysis of Nasal Anatomy in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyEravci FC, Özer H, Arbağ H et al.2022PMID 34436559Summary
- ASJ Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional OutcomesKeyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B et al.2022PMID 34864854Summary
- APS Closed Piezo Preservation RhinoplastyAlmazov I, Rovira RV, Farhadov V2022PMID 35169916Summary
- APS Comparison of Free Diced and Multiple Toothpick-Shaped Costal Cartilage Injection Techniques for Augmentation RhinoplastyGu T, Li X, Yang X et al.2022PMID 34595596Summary
- APS Diced Cartilage Techniques in RhinoplastyDong W, Han R, Fan F2022PMID 34731262Summary
- APS 2022PMID 35412066
- APS 2022PMID 35299264