rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2023

FPS Clin Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · 2023

Open Preservation Rhinoplasty Using the Piezo Electric Instrument

Goksel A, Tran KN.

What this paper says

A review arguing that the open approach makes preservation rhinoplasty more accessible and gives powered instruments better access, with piezoelectric devices allowing more precise handling of the bone and cartilage roof.

Overview

Preservation rhinoplasty represents a shift toward keeping structurally sound anatomy and reshaping existing nasal structures rather than removing them. The authors state it is gaining popularity because of claimed functional and appearance benefits from preserving the keystone area and the bridge lines. They argue the open approach and piezoelectric instruments together make the technique easier to perform well.

Sections of note

  • Review article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no outcomes, no complication rates and no follow up.
  • The claimed benefits of preserving the keystone area and dorsal aesthetic lines are described as theoretic.
  • The open approach allows the deformity to be seen clearly from the tip to the bridge.
  • It also enables easier access for powered instruments.
  • The piezoelectric device, with its range of rhinoplasty tips, enables more precise management of the bone and cartilage roof.
  • The authors state it reduces the risk of surface irregularities.
  • The stated result is an optimized overall surgical outcome.

What it means for a patient

  • The open approach adds a small incision between the nostrils in exchange for direct view and instrument access.
  • Powered instruments need that access, which is why the two are paired here.
  • Surface irregularities on the bridge are the specific problem the precision is aimed at.
  • No results, rates or comparisons are reported, and the underlying benefits are described by the authors themselves as theoretic.

Why this paper matters

Preservation rhinoplasty began as an endonasal technique and has been increasingly combined with the open approach and powered instruments. This article makes the case for that combination. It provides no evidence that the combination improves results.

Terms

  • Preservation rhinoplasty: keeping and repositioning existing structures rather than removing and rebuilding.
  • Open approach: surgery through an incision across the columella, lifting the nasal skin.
  • Piezoelectric device: a powered instrument that cuts bone with high frequency vibration.
  • Keystone area: where the nasal bones meet the cartilage of the bridge.
  • Osseocartilaginous vault: the combined bone and cartilage roof of the nose.
  • Dorsal aesthetic lines: the two shadow lines running down the bridge.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Preservation rhinoplasty represents a growing shift in rhinoplasty philosophy toward preserving structurally sound anatomy and reshaping existing nasal structures into esthetic and functional ideals. It is fast gaining popularity owing to the theoretic functional and esthetic benefits of preserving the dorsal keystone…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
Year
2023
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2023.

  1. ASJ
    2023PMID 37338117Summary
  2. ASJ
    2023PMID 36594157Summary
  3. ASJ
    2023PMID 37707591
  4. ASJ
    2023PMID 36752982
  5. ASJ
    2023PMID 36402140Full text
  6. ASJ
    2023PMID 35908175Summary
  7. APS
    2023PMID 36163553Summary
  8. APS
    2023PMID 36826521Summary