rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2023

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2023

Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT

Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM, Ross R, Lee M.

What this paper says

Nine rhinoplasty consultation questions were put to ChatGPT and rated by specialist plastic surgeons, who found the answers coherent and understandable but limited in detail and personalization.

Overview

ChatGPT is a large language model that produces human like text. The authors ran an observational study to see whether it could give informative and accurate answers to questions simulating a first rhinoplasty consultation. The nine questions were taken from a checklist published by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and the responses were assessed by specialist plastic surgeons with extensive rhinoplasty experience.

Sections of note

  • Design: observational study. Level of evidence V.
  • Nine questions were prompted, sourced from an American Society of Plastic Surgeons patient checklist.
  • Responses were judged on three criteria: accessibility, informativeness and accuracy.
  • Assessors were specialist plastic surgeons with extensive rhinoplasty experience.
  • Finding: the answers were coherent and easily comprehensible, showing handling of natural language in a health context.
  • The responses emphasized the importance of an individualized approach in aesthetic surgery.
  • Identified limitation: the model could not provide more detailed or personalized advice.
  • No scoring scale, numeric ratings or inter-rater agreement figures appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • A language model can produce readable general information about rhinoplasty, but it cannot examine your nose or advise on your specific case.
  • The surgeons noted the answers stayed general. Detail and personalization were where the model fell short.
  • The authors suggest the value lies where access to medical advice is limited or where a patient hesitates to ask a professional.
  • Limits: nine questions, no scoring scale reported, no comparison with information from surgeons or from patient websites, and a small number of assessors.

Why this paper matters

Patients research procedures online before ever booking a consultation, and language models have become part of that first step. Documenting what these tools get right and where they stop short is the first stage of understanding their role. The risks of relying on them, and their accuracy across a wider range of questions, remain unassessed.

Terms

  • Large language model: software trained on text that generates human like written responses.
  • ChatGPT: a publicly available conversational large language model.
  • Observational study: research that records what happens without assigning any intervention.
  • Level of evidence V: the weakest evidence grade, covering expert opinion and observations.
  • Individualized approach: tailoring surgical planning to one patient's anatomy and goals.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT is an open-source artificial large language model that uses deep learning to produce human-like text dialogue. This observational study evaluated the ability of ChatGPT to provide informative and accurate responses to a set of hypothetical questions designed to simulate an initial consultation about rhinoplasty.

Methods: Nine questions were prompted to ChatGPT on rhinoplasty. The questions were sourced from a checklist published by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and the responses were assessed for accessibility, informativeness, and accuracy by Specialist Plastic Surgeons with extensive experience in rhinoplasty.

Results: ChatGPT was able to provide coherent and easily comprehensible answers to the questions posed, demonstrating its understanding of natural language in a health-specific context. The responses emphasized the importance of an individualized approach, particularly in aesthetic plastic surgery. However, the study also highlighted ChatGPT's limitations in providing more detailed or personalized advice.

Conclusion: Overall, the results suggest that ChatGPT has the potential to provide valuable information to patients in a medical context, particularly in situations where patients may be hesitant to seek advice from medical professionals or where access to medical advice is limited. However, further research is needed to determine the scope and limitations of AI language models in this domain and to assess the potential benefits and risks associated with their use.

Level Of Evidence V: Observational study under respected authorities. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2023
Authors
6
Type
Observational Study, Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2023.

  1. ASJ
    2023PMID 36594157Summary
  2. ASJ
    2023PMID 36656674Summary
  3. ASJ
    2023PMID 36752982
  4. ASJ
    2023PMID 36793242
  5. ASJ
    2023PMID 36633571
  6. ASJ
    2023PMID 36478029Summary
  7. ASJ
    2023PMID 36402140Full text
  8. APS
    2023PMID 36826521Summary