Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2023
Comparison Between Patient and Plastic Surgeon Aesthetic Analysis in Rhinoplasty Consultation
Alosfoor M, Alkhalifah AA, Algadiem EA, Alarfaj AA, Alsalman A.
What this paper says
Across 57 rhinoplasty consultations, surgeon and patient assessments of the nose agreed on only a few features, with the dorsal hump and a drooping tip the most agreed and the columella the most disagreed.
Overview
A surgeon analyzes a nose by measured proportions, while a patient judges it by self image, and rhinoplasty aims at the patient's satisfaction. The authors tested how far the two views coincide. They ran a cross sectional study on 57 primary rhinoplasty consultations at the Plastic Surgery Clinic in King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, between June and September 2017. Surgeon and patient each completed the same 27 item questionnaire about nasal appearance before the consultation.
Sections of note
- Design: cross sectional study, 57 primary rhinoplasty consultations, single clinic.
- Instrument: identical 27 component questionnaires completed separately by surgeon and patient, with agreement measured by Cohen's Kappa and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
- Overall appearance of the nose showed moderate agreement, kappa 0.2 to 0.39.
- Best agreement: dorsal hump, kappa 0.6, p equal to 0.001, and tip drops down, kappa 0.41, p equal to 0.002.
- Worst agreement: the columella, kappa minus 0.06, and the suitability of the front part of the nose, kappa minus 0.09. Negative values mean agreement below chance.
- Across most questionnaire components agreement was slight or absent, kappa 0.004 to 0.39.
What it means for a patient
- You and your surgeon are likely to agree that you have a hump or a drooping tip, and unlikely to agree about most other features.
- Features seen mainly from the front or from below, such as the columella, are where the two views diverge most.
- The practical consequence is that naming what specifically bothers you, feature by feature, matters more than assuming the surgeon sees the same nose you do.
- Limits: 57 consultations, one clinic, data collected in 2017, and agreement measured before surgery only.
Why this paper matters
Dissatisfaction after rhinoplasty often traces to a mismatch between what the patient wanted changed and what the surgeon set out to change. This study quantifies that gap at the consultation itself. It does not follow patients forward, so whether low agreement predicts unhappiness is unanswered.
Terms
- Dorsal hump: the bump of bone and cartilage on the bridge of the nose.
- Columella: the strip of tissue between the nostrils.
- Cohen's Kappa: a statistic measuring rater agreement beyond chance, where 1 is perfect and 0 is chance.
- Cross-sectional study: a study measuring a group at one point in time.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Unlabelled: The surgeon's aesthetic analysis of the nose is based on scientific measures of its proportions and dimensions. Because the primary aim of rhinoplasty is targeted at the patient's satisfaction with self-image, patients' perception and satisfaction are of paramount importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgeon versus patient nasal aesthetic analysis.
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 57 primary rhinoplasty consultations during the period June and September 2017 at the Plastic Surgery Clinic in King Fahad Hospital-Hofuf. The surgeon and the patients were handed identical questionnaires before the consultations. The questionnaire has 27 components regarding the nasal appearance.
Results: The surgeon's and the patients' perceptions regarding reliability was assessed by Cohen's Kappa and Pearson's correlation coefficient. There was moderate agreement with the overall appearance of the nose (κ = 0.2-0.39). The most agreed-upon components were "dorsal hump" (κ = 0.6, P = 0.001) and "tip drops down" (κ = 0.41, P = 0.002). The columella and the suitability of the front part of the nose had the largest disagreement (κ = -0.06 and κ = -0.09, respectively). The level of agreement among most of the questionnaires' components was slight or nonexistent (κ = 0.004-0.39).
Conclusions: The surgeon and patients have a minimum agreement regarding the view of nasal appearance, mostly with the suitability of the front part and the columella. The parts of the nose agreed upon the most were "dorsal hump" and "tip drops down". Exploring the differences between patient and surgeon aesthetic analysis of the nose will aid in addressing the discrepancies and improving surgical outcome and satisfaction.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- ASJ An Anatomic Analysis of the Bony Vault: From the Perspective of Osteotomy in RhinoplastyKim SJ, Kim TH, Lee KH2023PMID 36594157Summary
- ASJ Analysis of the Cause of Cartilage Warping in the Rhinoplasty of Costal Cartilage and Application of Embed-In Graft in Revisional SurgeryXu Y, Zhang X, You J et al.2023PMID 36656674Summary
- ASJ Commentary on: An Anatomic Analysis of the Bony Vault: From the Perspective of Osteotomy in RhinoplastySalehi PP, Frants A, Nassif PS2023PMID 36752982
- ASJ 2023PMID 36793242
- ASJ 2023PMID 36633571
- ASJ Difference in Perception of Nasal Aesthetic Appearance Between Surgeons and Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center PerspectiveKim CH, Kandathil CK, Saltychev M et al.2023PMID 36478029Summary
- ASJ Nasal Bones Anatomy and Analysis for Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyFonseca E, Baldini N, Alomani M et al.2023PMID 36402140Full text
- APS A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) PrinciplesTremp M, Schneider J, Raghu RBN et al.2023PMID 36826521Summary