rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2023

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2023

Rhinoplasty for Thick-Skinned Noses: A Systematic Review

Vahidi N, Wang L, Peng GL, Nassif P, Azizzadeh B.

What this paper says

A systematic review of 28 articles on rhinoplasty in thick skinned patients, most of them low level evidence, proposing a management plan spanning before, during and after surgery.

Overview

Thick nasal skin hides fine changes made to the framework beneath it and holds swelling longer, which makes results less predictable. The authors searched PubMed and Google Scholar for clinical studies linking nasal skin thickness to rhinoplasty outcomes, and reviewed what the literature supports for maximizing results in these patients.

Sections of note

  • Design: systematic review. Level of evidence III as assigned by the journal.
  • 28 articles met inclusion criteria for final analysis.
  • Quality by CEBM guidelines: three articles were level 1, while the majority were level 4 at 39 percent and level 5 at 32 percent.
  • Most papers came from the USA at 35 percent, followed by Saudi Arabia at 14 percent.
  • The authors outline a management scheme divided into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative time points.
  • Stated conclusion: optimal results depend on an individualized medical and surgical plan and on realistic expectations.
  • No pooled outcome figures, complication rates or patient numbers appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Thick skin drapes over the framework, so refinements made to the cartilage show less than they would under thin skin.
  • Management is described as spanning the whole course of care, not just the operation, which implies skin treatment and postoperative measures form part of the plan.
  • The evidence base is weak. Only three of 28 articles were the highest evidence level, and roughly seven in ten were level 4 or 5.
  • The abstract lists no specific interventions from the management scheme, so what it recommends cannot be read from it.

Why this paper matters

Skin thickness is one of the strongest predictors of whether a rhinoplasty result matches the plan, and thick skinned patients account for a disproportionate share of revisions and dissatisfaction. Assembling the literature shows how little high quality guidance exists. Which interventions actually improve results in this group remains unproven.

Terms

  • Thick-skinned nose: a nose with a heavy skin and soft tissue envelope that masks underlying shape.
  • Soft-tissue envelope: the skin and underlying layers covering the nasal framework.
  • CEBM levels: the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale ranking study strength, 1 strongest.
  • Systematic review: a structured search and appraisal of all studies meeting set criteria.
  • Individualized treatment plan: care tailored to one patient's anatomy and goals.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to critically examine the literature published on rhinoplasties in thick-skinned patients to determine how to maximize outcomes in these patients.

Methods: The PubMEd and Google Scholar databases were searched for clinical studies related to nasal skin thickness as it relates to rhinoplasty surgery and surgical outcomes.

Results: We performed a review of the current body of literature and identified twenty-eight articles that met our inclusion criteria for final analysis. Three articles were level of evidence 1 by CEBM guidelines, while the majority were level 4 (39%) and 5 (32%). Most papers were published in the USA (35%), followed by Saudi Arabia (14%). Here, we outline the current body of literature regarding thick-skinned noses in rhinoplasty surgery and identify optimization strategies.

Conclusion: We highlight a management scheme subdivided into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative timepoints for the comprehensive management of this patient population. Optimal results rely on an individualized medical and surgical treatment plan and regimen to achieve desired and realistic results.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2023
Authors
5
Type
Systematic Review, Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2023.

  1. APS
    2023PMID 36163553Summary
  2. APS
    2023PMID 37286843Full text
  3. APS
    2023PMID 36826521Summary
  4. APS
    2023PMID 37095384Summary
  5. APS
    2023PMID 35606536Summary
  6. APS
    2023PMID 36323963Summary
  7. APS
    2023PMID 37097454
  8. APS
    2023PMID 37328654Summary