rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Nasal tip · 2024

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2024

The Treatment of Alar Base Depression in Rhinoplasty with Diced Autologous Cartilage or Mass Cartilage: A Systematic Review

Xiang X, Wang X, Wang S.

What this paper says

Reviewing six studies covering 165 patients, both diced cartilage and solid block cartilage corrected hollowing at the base of the nose, with each carrying different advantages.

Overview

The alar base is where the sides of the nose meet the upper lip. When it is depressed, the folds beside the nose deepen, the angle between nose and lip narrows and the middle of the face looks flat. How best to build it up remains contested. The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane from January 2000 to April 2023, with two investigators screening independently.

Sections of note

  • Design: systematic review. Level of evidence III.
  • 269 articles were retrieved; after removing duplicates and screening, 6 articles covering 165 patients were included.
  • Both diced cartilage and mass cartilage produced favorable correction of alar base depression.
  • Diced cartilage was credited with better malleability, lighter border contours, a more natural appearance and superior long term effects.
  • Mass cartilage was described as offering procedural advantages, with possibly less long term shrinkage and lower risk of shifting position.
  • Note the abstract credits diced cartilage with superior long term effects while also stating mass cartilage may resorb less, which are difficult to reconcile.

What it means for a patient

  • Both techniques use your own cartilage, and both were reported to work.
  • The trade off is between a moldable filling that blends more naturally and a solid piece that may hold its volume better and shift less.
  • The authors recommend choosing based on individual patient characteristics rather than a single default.
  • Limits: six studies and 165 patients across the whole review, and no pooled outcome or complication rates are reported in the abstract.

Why this paper matters

Alar base depression affects the middle of the face rather than the nose alone, and it is often overlooked in rhinoplasty planning. Assembling the small literature identifies the two established options and their trade offs. With six heterogeneous studies and no pooled numbers, the review cannot rank them.

Terms

  • Alar base: the foot of the nostril where the nose meets the upper lip and cheek.
  • Alar base depression: hollowing at that junction, flattening the middle of the face.
  • Diced cartilage: cartilage cut into tiny pieces so it can be molded like a paste.
  • Mass cartilage: a solid block of cartilage placed as one piece.
  • Nasolabial fold: the crease running from the side of the nose to the corner of the mouth.
  • Resorption: gradual absorption and loss of graft volume by the body.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Alar base is the basal part where the two sides of the nose and the upper lip are connected. Alar base depression affects the overall facial contour by making the nasolabial folds deepen, the nasolabial angle smaller, the center of the face flat, etc. Despite the rapid development of rhinoplasty, controversy still exists regarding the treatment of alar base depression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two prevalent techniques-diced autologous cartilage and mass cartilage-for addressing alar base depression.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching the literature published in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, Cochrane from January 2000 to April 2023 with the key words 'alar base depression or depressed alar base' and 'alar base augmentation,' and 2 investigators independently screened the retrieved literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: A total of 269 articles were obtained through database search. After removing duplicates, reading titles and abstracts, and finally reviewing the full text, 6 articles were included in the final study, including 165 patients.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that both diced autologous cartilage and mass cartilage techniques exhibit favorable outcomes in correcting alar base depression. Diced autologous cartilage offers better malleability, lighter border contours, and a more natural appearance. On the other hand, diced autologous cartilage seems to offer superior long-term effects, while mass cartilage presents certain surgical procedural advantages. Also, compared to diced cartilage, mass cartilage may have a lower rate of long-term resorption and a lower risk of displacement. This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment selection based on individual patient characteristics.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article, Systematic Review
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 39042732Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 39012964Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 37798507Summary
  5. APS
    2024PMID 37610518Full text
  6. APS
    Diced Cartilage Techniques in Rhinoplasty
    Pensato R, Al-Amer R, La Padula S
    2024PMID 37605030Full text
  7. APS
    2024PMID 38858246Summary
  8. APS
    2024PMID 38233685Summary