rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2024

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2024

Hybrid Chin Advancement: Combining Fat and Sliced Cartilage Grafts for Chin Augmentation During Rhinoplasty

Selamioğlu E, Küçüker İ.

What this paper says

In 49 patients with a receding chin of 2.5 to 6 millimetres, combining septal cartilage with fat grafting produced greater chin advancement than fat alone, while implants achieved the most.

Overview

Balance between the middle and lower thirds of the face affects how the nose reads, so a receding chin is often addressed alongside rhinoplasty. The authors present a method of assessing chin deformity and a hybrid treatment. Among their patients, 22 who were offered a chin implant declined, prompting an alternative approach, and 20 with insufficient cartilage received fat grafting alone.

Sections of note

  • Design: retrospective analysis, 49 patients with chin retrusion of 2.5 to 6 millimetres. Level of evidence IV.
  • The hybrid technique supports tissue beneath the muscle with nasal septum cartilage plus fat injection, and tissue above the muscle with fat injection alone.
  • Three groups were compared: implant, hybrid chin advancement and fat grafting alone.
  • Preoperative Legan angles were statistically similar across groups.
  • Postoperative Legan angles and advancement were significantly greater in the implant group, p less than 0.0001.
  • Comparing hybrid against fat grafting alone, the hybrid group achieved significantly greater postoperative angles and advancement, p less than 0.0001.
  • Stated guidance: fat grafting suffices for about 2 millimetres, the hybrid method for about 4 millimetres, and implants or bone genioplasty for more than 6 millimetres.

What it means for a patient

  • The amount of advancement needed determines the method, and the article gives approximate thresholds for each.
  • The hybrid approach uses your own septal cartilage, already exposed during rhinoplasty, plus your own fat, avoiding an implant.
  • Patients declining an implant was the driver for developing the alternative, so the technique addresses a preference as much as an anatomical need.
  • Limits: 49 patients, retrospective, one surgeon, groups formed by patient choice rather than randomization, and no stated follow up length.

Why this paper matters

Profile balance depends on the chin as much as the nose, but many patients refuse an implant. Offering graded alternatives keyed to the amount of advancement needed makes chin correction more acceptable. How long fat and cartilage grafts hold their volume at the chin is not reported.

Terms

  • Chin retrusion: a chin that sits further back than the ideal facial profile line.
  • Genioplasty: surgery to reposition or reshape the chin bone.
  • Fat grafting: transferring the patient's own fat to add volume.
  • Legan angle: a measurement of facial convexity used to assess chin position.
  • Sagittal plane: the front to back plane seen in a side profile view.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Facial balance significantly impacts aesthetics, particularly in the middle and lower thirds. Patients with chin retrusion often benefit from sagittal plane chin advancement in rhinoplasty, enhancing surgical outcomes and satisfaction.

Objectives: This article presents a method for analyzing chin deformities and discusses a hybrid treatment approach to harmonize facial features, complementing rhinoplasty.

Methods: The chin positions of patients treated by the senior author were assessed. A retrospective analysis included 49 patients with chin retrusion of 2.5-6 mm. Among them, 22 patients initially offered chin implants declined, leading to planned chin augmentation. Fat grafting was exclusively performed for 20 patients lacking sufficient cartilage. The "Hybrid Chin Advancement" technique involved supporting tissues beneath muscles with nasal septum cartilage and fat injections and tissues above muscles with fat injection alone.

Results: Pre- and postoperative Legan angle measurements and chin advancements were compared across three groups. While preoperative Legan angles were statistically similar, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the implant group (p < 0.0001). Comparing hybrid chin advancement and fat grafting groups, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the hybrid chin group (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Fat grafting suffices for mild advancements (~ 2 mm), while the hybrid chin method is effective for moderate advancements (~ 4 mm). For advancements exceeding 6 mm, implants or osseous genioplasty are optimal. Our study's hybrid approach offers an easy, safe, and reliable method for achieving facial harmony in the lower two-thirds without compromising patient expectations.

Level Of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  2. APS
    2024PMID 37610518Full text
  3. APS
    Diced Cartilage Techniques in Rhinoplasty
    Pensato R, Al-Amer R, La Padula S
    2024PMID 37605030Full text
  4. APS
    2024PMID 38233685Summary
  5. APS
    2024PMID 38609657Summary
  6. APS
    2024PMID 37626136Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 37567945Summary
  8. FPSAM
    2024PMID 38502837Summary