Impact of Mask-Wearing on Public Attitudes, Perceptions, and Interest in Rhinoplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Alsuhaim MM, Fallatah AA, Shawosh MH, Althobaity AN.
What this paper says
Surveying the Saudi public during the pandemic, 62.8 percent disagreed that rhinoplasty is unnecessary while masks are worn, indicating continued interest despite the nose being covered.
Overview
The authors investigated how mask wearing affected attitudes, perceptions and interest in rhinoplasty in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sample size was calculated with Epi Info software and a pilot study confirmed feasibility. Analysis used both descriptive and inferential statistics, with participant privacy maintained throughout.
Sections of note
- Design: cross sectional public survey in Saudi Arabia.
- Most participants were women, 81.7 percent, aged 18 to 24, single, and from the eastern region.
- 16.3 percent believed rhinoplasty is exclusive to women; 15.1 percent considered it solely cosmetic; 50.3 percent thought it should be restricted to adults.
- 25 participants, 3.9 percent, had undergone rhinoplasty. Of those, 64 percent decided independently while acquaintances influenced the rest.
- 62.8 percent disagreed that rhinoplasty is unnecessary while wearing a mask.
- Chi-square testing found significant associations between preference for rhinoplasty during mask use and sex, gender exclusivity beliefs, cosmetic purpose, cultural discouragement and surgeon type.
- Stated conclusion: mask wearing led to increased interest in rhinoplasty.
What it means for a patient
- Covering the nose in public did not reduce interest in changing it, which suggests the motivation is not solely about how others see it.
- Half the respondents thought rhinoplasty should be restricted to adults, and a sixth still associated it with women only.
- About two thirds of those who had surgery made the decision themselves rather than under influence from others.
- Limits: cross sectional survey, one country, respondents skewed heavily female and young, and the abstract does not state the total number surveyed.
Why this paper matters
The pandemic was widely reported to have increased demand for facial surgery, attributed to video calls and to masks concealing recovery. Survey data tests that in one population and finds continued interest. The authors note the study cannot show whether the interest translated into more operations.
Terms
- Cross-sectional study: a study measuring a population at one point in time.
- Chi-square test: a statistical test comparing categories between groups.
- Descriptive statistics: summaries such as counts and percentages.
- Inferential statistics: methods testing whether observed differences are likely real.
- Epi Info: public health software used for sample size calculation and analysis.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the influence of mask use on attitudes, perceptions, and interests in rhinoplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Our objective is to identify the factors influencing public attitudes, perceptions, and interest in undergoing rhinoplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the elements that altered individuals' decisions regarding the procedure.
Methods: Epi Info software was used to calculate sample size, and a pilot study confirmed the feasibility of the research. Data analysis incorporated both descriptive and inferential statistics, with results illustrated in tables and graphs. Participant privacy was ensured throughout.
Results: Most participants were women (81.7%), 18-24 years, single, and from the eastern region. Only 16.3% believed rhinoplasty is exclusive to women, 15.1% considered it solely cosmetic, and 50.3% thought it should be restricted to adults. Among 25 participants (3.9%) who had rhinoplasty, 64% made the decision independently, whereas acquaintances influenced the rest. Additionally, 62.8% disagreed with the notion that rhinoplasty is unnecessary while wearing masks, indicating a preference for the procedure even with mask use. A χ2 test revealed significant associations between rhinoplasty preference during mask usage and sex (P = 0.019), gender exclusivity (P < 0.001), cosmetic purpose (P = 0.033), cultural discouragement (P < 0.001), and surgeon type (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased interest in rhinoplasty. However, further research is needed to determine if this interest in rhinoplasty translates into an increase in surgical procedures being performed.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2025
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2014 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2025.
- PRS-GO A Novel Approach to Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty Utilizing a Pedicled Fibrofatty FlapLasky S, Moshal T, Jolibois M et al.2025PMID 39911533Summary
- PRS-GO Assessment of Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients Following Rhinoplasty: A Cross-sectional StudyAl-Ayadhi LY, Alghamdi HA, Almaiman NI et al.2025PMID 41158592Summary
- PRS-GO Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques for Correcting Cephalic Malposition of the Lower Lateral Cartilages in RhinoplastyNassar A, Naba J2025PMID 40469545Summary
- PRS-GO Frozen Cadaveric Rib Grafts in Primary or Revision Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisBohler F, Koenig ZA, Chaiyasate K2025PMID 40765688Full text
- PRS-GO Low Block Hybrid Rhinoplasty as a New Alternative for Mixed-Race NosesAzabache R, Robles J, Segura C2025PMID 41282447Summary
- PRS-GO Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Modified Rino-4-Puntos Technique With Hyaluronic Acid Improves the Appearance of Nasal Septal DeviationSilikovich F, Kroumpouzos G2025PMID 40416407Summary
- PRS-GO Outcomes of Open Versus Closed Rhinoplasty, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysisAbi Zeid Daou C, Jalkh RM, Semaan ZM et al.2025PMID 40771258Summary
- PRS-GO Pilot Study: Thread Rhinoplasty With Different Methods of Barbed Thread ImplantationTamura T, Furuichi Y, Tamura T et al.2025PMID 40433226Summary