rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Nasal tip · 2025

PRS-GO Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2025

Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques for Correcting Cephalic Malposition of the Lower Lateral Cartilages in Rhinoplasty

Nassar A, Naba J.

What this paper says

A review sorting the techniques for correcting misangled tip cartilages into four groups, finding several produce good results but that long term data on stability and complications is lacking.

Overview

Lateral crural malposition means the outer arms of the tip cartilages diverge less than 30 degrees from the midline, pointing toward the inner corner of the eye rather than outward. This creates both appearance and breathing problems. Many correction techniques have been described but never compared. The authors reviewed the literature, grouped the techniques, and analyzed what drives the choice between them.

Sections of note

  • Article type: literature review categorizing and comparing techniques.
  • Definition used: cartilages diverging less than 30 degrees from the midline toward the inner corner of the eye on the same side.
  • Four technique groups: flaps, grafts, transection of the lateral crus, and suture based methods.
  • Both functional and aesthetic outcomes were analyzed, along with factors driving technique selection.
  • Stated determinants of choice: surgeon expertise, availability of cartilage, and patient specific anatomy.
  • Stated finding: multiple techniques have shown favorable outcomes.
  • Stated gap: long term data on complications and structural stability remain limited.
  • The authors state this is the first comprehensive comparison of these techniques.

What it means for a patient

  • Misangled tip cartilages produce a nose that both looks pinched or boxy and collapses on breathing in, so correction addresses two problems.
  • Four different families of solution exist, ranging from moving the cartilage to supporting it with grafts to reshaping it with sutures.
  • The choice depends partly on how much cartilage is available, which matters most in revision cases.
  • The review reports no pooled rates or outcome figures, and explicitly identifies long term stability as unknown.

Why this paper matters

Cephalic malposition is a recognized cause of both a pinched tip and a collapsing side wall, and it is frequently missed before surgery. Organizing the scattered techniques into four groups makes them comparable for the first time. Which one to choose remains a matter of surgeon preference rather than evidence.

Terms

  • Lateral crus: the outer arm of the lower nasal cartilage, forming the nostril rim and side wall.
  • Cephalic malposition: the tip cartilages angled too far toward the eyes rather than outward.
  • Medial canthus: the inner corner of the eye where the eyelids meet.
  • Transection: cutting a structure across its width.
  • Suture-based method: reshaping cartilage with stitches rather than cutting it.
  • Structural stability: whether a correction holds its position over time.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Lateral crural malposition, characterized by lower lateral cartilages diverging less than 30 degrees from the midline toward the ipsilateral medial canthus, presents both functional and aesthetic challenges in rhinoplasty. Various surgical techniques have been described for correction, but no comprehensive review has compared their efficacy.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to categorize and evaluate surgical techniques for correcting cephalic malposition. Techniques were grouped into flaps, grafts, lateral crura transection, and suture-based methods. Functional and aesthetic outcomes, as well as factors influencing technique selection, were analyzed.

Results: The selection of a surgical technique depends on factors such as surgeon expertise, cartilage availability, and patient-specific anatomical considerations. Although multiple techniques have demonstrated favorable outcomes, long-term data on complications and structural stability remain limited, highlighting the need for further research.

Conclusions: This article is the first to comprehensively describe and compare surgical techniques for cephalic malposition correction. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for technique selection and to assess long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Year
2025
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2025.

  1. ASJ
    2025PMID 39876773Summary
  2. ASJ
    2025PMID 39676167Summary
  3. ASJ
    2025PMID 40408098Summary
  4. APS
    2025PMID 38977456Summary
  5. APS
    2025PMID 40055225
  6. APS
    2025PMID 39187588Summary
  7. APS
    2025PMID 40195133Summary
  8. APS
    2025PMID 40699341