Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2025
One Profile to Rule Them All? A Neural Network Analysis of the Homogenizing Effect of Primary Rhinoplasty
Khaw KL, Lu SM.
What this paper says
Using Amazon's face-recognition AI on 145 Caucasian women's before-and-after photographs from three surgeons' websites, patients became 17.58% more similar to each other after rhinoplasty, and most similar to other patients of the same surgeon (30.89% versus 14.15% across surgeons).
Overview
Rhinoplasty aims to improve the nose while preserving individuality. The authors tested whether surgery makes patients look more alike, and whether each surgeon leaves a recognisable "signature." They collected standardised, unedited frontal, lateral and oblique photographs of 145 primary rhinoplasty patients (Surgeon A 50, B 50, C 45) and used Amazon Rekognition to compute similarity between all pre-op images and all post-op images.
Sections of note
- Overall similarity increased 17.58% after surgery (P < .001): lateral 19.17%, oblique 19.02%, frontal 14.38%.
- By surgeon: A +37.50%, B +24.60%, C +17.68%.
- Within-surgeon similarity increase (30.89%) was significantly greater than between-surgeon increase (14.15%).
- Level of Evidence 3.
What it means for a patient
- Rhinoplasty tends to move noses toward a common ideal, and each surgeon has a recognisable style.
- Looking at a surgeon's gallery tells you what your nose is likely to be pulled toward; choose a surgeon whose results you would want on your own face.
- The study measured similarity, not attractiveness or satisfaction.
Why this paper matters
It is the first quantification of the homogenising effect and the surgeon signature using neural networks. Limits: website photographs (selected by surgeons), one ethnic group and sex, similarity metric is a black box.
Terms
- Neural network: an AI system trained to recognise patterns, here faces.
- Amazon Rekognition: a commercial face-comparison service.
- Homogenisation: becoming more alike.
- Intracohort / intercohort: within one surgeon's patients versus across surgeons.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“A goal of aesthetic rhinoplasty is to improve nasal aesthetics while preserving individuality. Objectives: We hypothesized that primary rhinoplasty has a homogenizing effect on a patient's appearance and in a distinct manner for a given rhinoplasty surgeon. Methods: Standardized, unedited preoperative and…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Bridging the Gap in Rhinoplasty Training: The Effectiveness of 3D Printed Models in Surgical EducationRehman U, Polglase N, Kahn D et al.2025PMID 40129179Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ In-House Virtual Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Reconstructive RhinoplastyRubio-Palau J, Gonçalves J, Malet-Contreras A et al.2025PMID 39161317Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- APS A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft RhinoplastyXia Y, Yuan J, Wang Z et al.2025PMID 39572464Summary
- APS Algorithm for the Treatment of Tip Malformation Combining a Clinical Qualitative Assessment and Specific Closed-Rhinoplasty Techniques Based on Retrospective Analysis of Pellegrini's Fellows 40 Years' ExperienceScattolin A, D'Ascanio L, Galzignato PF et al.2025PMID 39187588Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary
- APS Free Crushed Cartilage Filler Graft to Optimize Tip Aesthetics in Asian RhinoplastyChang BL, Cho WK, Jang YJ2025PMID 39322839Summary