rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2016

CPS Clinics in Plastic Surgery · 2016

Open and Closed Rhinoplasty

Cafferty A, Becker DG.

What this paper says

A review of the two main ways into the nose, setting out the anatomy, the incisions available, when each approach is preferable, and the trade-offs in choosing between them.

Overview

Rhinoplasty can be performed through incisions hidden inside the nostrils, or by adding a small external cut across the columella so the skin can be lifted and the framework seen directly. The authors state that most surgeons use both and recognise that particular situations favour one. The article reviews anatomy, incisions and approaches, then discusses the decision.

Sections of note

  • The article is a review chapter, not a study of patients.
  • It reviews the anatomy relevant to choosing an approach.
  • It sets out the incisions available to the surgeon in each approach.
  • It gives general indications for the external approach and for the endonasal approach.
  • It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each.
  • No patient numbers, complication rates, satisfaction data or comparative outcomes are reported in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Neither approach is universally correct. The choice depends on what the nose needs and on the surgeon's judgement.
  • The endonasal approach leaves no visible external scar but gives more limited access to the tip.
  • The external approach adds a small scar under the nose and gives direct view of the framework, which matters most for complex tip work and revision surgery.
  • This is a narrative review without pooled data, so it cannot say how often either approach produces a better result.

Why this paper matters

The open versus closed question is the oldest running argument in rhinoplasty and still determines how most operations are planned. A review that frames it as a choice per patient rather than a fixed allegiance reflects the mainstream position. What no review of this kind resolves is whether the approaches differ in measured outcomes, since patients are not randomly assigned between them.

Terms

  • Open or external rhinoplasty: an approach using a small cut across the columella so the nasal skin can be lifted.
  • Closed or endonasal rhinoplasty: an approach using incisions entirely inside the nostrils.
  • Columella: the strip of skin and cartilage between the two nostrils.
  • Incision: a surgical cut used to gain access.
  • Indication: the clinical reason for choosing a particular treatment.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Most surgeons recognize the broad utility of both endonasal and external rhinoplasty approaches. Most understand that there are situations when a given approach offers advantages and may be considered preferable. In this article, the anatomy, incisions, and approaches that are available to the surgeon are reviewed.…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
Year
2016
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2016.

  1. CPS
    2016PMID 26616715Summary
  2. CPS
    2016PMID 26616708Summary
  3. CPS
    2016PMID 26616707Summary
  4. CPS
    2016PMID 26616703Summary
  5. CPS
    2016PMID 26616706Summary
  6. CPS
    Revision Rhinoplasty
    Loyo M, Wang TD
    2016PMID 26616705Summary
  7. CPS
    2016PMID 26616711Summary
  8. CPS
    2016PMID 26616714Summary