rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2016

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2016

Role of the Cephalic Trim in Modern Rhinoplasty

Nagarkar P, Stark RY, Pezeshk RA, Amirlak B, Rohrich RJ.

What this paper says

A review describing five versions of the cephalic trim, a long-established method of narrowing the nasal tip, with a decision algorithm for choosing between them based on tip type, cartilage strength and skin quality.

Overview

Trimming the upper edge of the tip cartilages has been accepted for decades as a way to refine a wide nasal tip. The authors state it has been widely misinterpreted, and that improper use carries long-term consequences. The article defines five variants and sets out how to choose among them from findings identified during assessment of the tip.

Sections of note

  • The article is a review, not a study of patients.
  • The cephalic trim is described as long accepted for shaping the nasal tip but frequently misapplied.
  • Improper use is stated to carry potential long-term consequences.
  • Three anatomic findings must be noted during tip analysis: whether the tip is boxy or bulbous, the strength of the cartilage, and the quality of the skin.
  • Five types of cephalic trim technique are described.
  • An algorithm is presented for selecting the appropriate technique from those anatomic findings. No patient numbers, complication rates or outcome data appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Removing cartilage from the tip is not a single operation but a family of variants, and how much is taken matters.
  • Taking too much weakens the tip's support, which is a known cause of late collapse and breathing problems, and this is what the authors mean by long-term consequences.
  • Which variant applies depends on the patient's own cartilage strength and skin thickness, not on the desired shape alone.
  • A narrative review with no reported cases or outcomes cannot show how often any variant succeeds.

Why this paper matters

Over-resection of the tip cartilages is a documented cause of revision rhinoplasty, and the cephalic trim is where much of that removal happens. Codifying it into defined variants with selection rules is an attempt to make a habitual step deliberate. Whether the algorithm reduces revision rates is not tested.

Terms

  • Cephalic trim: removal of the upper strip of the tip cartilages to narrow the tip.
  • Lower lateral cartilage: the paired cartilages that form and support the nasal tip.
  • Boxy tip: a nasal tip that is square rather than rounded when seen from below.
  • Bulbous tip: a rounded, wide nasal tip lacking definition.
  • Over-resection: removal of too much cartilage, weakening support.
  • Algorithm: a defined sequence of decisions for choosing a treatment.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“There have been a variety of techniques describing nasal tip refinement. The cephalic trim has long been accepted as a means for shaping the nasal tip, but it has been misinterpreted by many surgeons. The improper use of a cephalic trim poses potential long-term sequelae. During analysis of the nasal tip, several…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2016
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2016.

  1. PRS
    2016PMID 27018701Summary
  2. PRS
    2016PMID 26710007Summary
  3. PRS
    2016PMID 26818321Summary
  4. PRS
    2016PMID 27140047
  5. PRS
    Digital Imaging in Secondary Rhinoplasty
    Lehrman CR, Lee MR, Ramanadham S et al.
    2016PMID 27219263Summary
  6. PRS
    2016PMID 27119921
  7. PRS
    2016PMID 27556616Summary
  8. PRS
    2016PMID 27119920Summary