rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Adolescent and aging nose · 2016

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2016

Rhinoplasty of the Aging Nose

Toriumi DM, Rosenberger E.

What this paper says

A review of how the nose changes with age and what rhinoplasty in older patients must do differently, arguing that technique has to resist forces that continue to act after surgery.

Overview

Ageing affects every part of the body, and the authors state the nose is especially susceptible. Several processes combine to produce a recognisable pattern of change. The article argues that operating on an aged nose requires understanding of ageing facial anatomy together with techniques built to hold their result against continuing remodelling.

Sections of note

  • The article is a review chapter, not a study of patients.
  • Contributing factors named are sun damage, hormone levels, the tissue's capacity to regenerate, tissue elasticity, resorption of bone, and gravity.
  • These are stated to combine into classic signs and symptoms of the ageing nose.
  • The stated requirement is comprehensive understanding of ageing facial anatomy.
  • Surgical techniques must be designed to resist these remodelling forces over time.
  • No patient numbers, techniques with outcomes, complication rates or measured data appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • The nose keeps changing after surgery, and in an older patient those changes continue in the same direction as before, so the operation has to allow for that.
  • Skin that has lost elasticity will not shrink to fit a reduced framework, which limits how much can be taken away.
  • Bone loss elsewhere in the face changes how the nose sits relative to the rest of it, so the nose is not the only variable.
  • A narrative review with no reported cases or outcomes cannot show which techniques hold up best over time.

Why this paper matters

Rhinoplasty technique developed largely around young patients with elastic skin and strong cartilage. Applying it unchanged to an aged nose ignores the forces that produced the ageing in the first place. Framing durability as the design requirement is the substantive point. Which techniques actually last longest in older patients is not established.

Terms

  • Tissue elasticity: the ability of skin and soft tissue to spring back after being stretched.
  • Bone resorption: gradual loss of bone volume with age.
  • Remodelling: continuing change in tissue shape over time.
  • Regenerative capability: the tissue's ability to repair and renew itself.
  • Nasal tip ptosis: drooping of the nasal tip, a common feature of the ageing nose.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The process of aging leads to countless bodily changes on both a macro- and microscopic scale. No organ system is unaffected; however, the nose is especially susceptible. Sun damage, hormone levels, regenerative capability, tissue elasticity, bone resorption, and the effects of gravity contribute to produce classic…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2016
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2016.

  1. FPS
    2016PMID 26862968Summary
  2. FPS
    2016PMID 26862969Summary
  3. JAMA FPS
    2016PMID 27149684Summary
  4. PRS
    Digital Imaging in Secondary Rhinoplasty
    Lehrman CR, Lee MR, Ramanadham S et al.
    2016PMID 27219263Summary