rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2021

FPSAM Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine · 2021

Rhinoplasty Photography: Lighting from Above Improves Visualization of Deviations and Irregularities

Tasman AJ.

What this paper says

In 40 rhinoplasty candidates photographed both ways, ten lay judges rated nasal irregularities as more visible under lighting from above in 30 of 40 photo pairs.

Overview

Standard clinical photography uses two diffused flash units from the front and sides, which the author argues differs from natural light and can hide relevant nasal irregularities by reducing contrast. The study tested whether lighting the face from above makes deviations and irregularities easier to see. Forty consecutive rhinoplasty candidates who had asked for correction of an irregularity or a crooked nose were photographed under both lighting conditions at an academic tertiary medical centre.

Sections of note

  • Prospective randomized controlled trial, 40 consecutive rhinoplasty candidates.
  • Each patient was photographed first with standard anterolateral lighting from two studio strobes with diffusor boxes, then with lighting from above.
  • Ten lay judges rated cropped front view images on a 5 point Likert scale.
  • Ratings were higher with lighting from above in 30 pairs, 75 percent; equal in 3, 7.5 percent; lower in 7, 17.5 percent.
  • Mean rating with lighting from above was 2.47, 95 percent confidence interval 2.22 to 2.72.
  • Mean rating with anterolateral lighting was 1.86, 95 percent confidence interval 1.61 to 2.11, a significant difference.
  • The author recommends adding lighting from above when standard lighting fails to show nasal irregularities.

What it means for a patient

  • How a nose is photographed changes how visible its irregularities appear, before any surgery is discussed.
  • The finding concerns documentation and planning, not the outcome of any operation.
  • Judges were laypeople, not surgeons, and rated only cropped front views.
  • The study shows that more irregularity is seen under overhead light; it does not establish which lighting is more accurate.

Why this paper matters

Preoperative and postoperative photographs are the primary record of a rhinoplasty result and are used to judge success. This trial shows that a lighting choice shifts perceived deformity by a measurable amount. It leaves unaddressed whether standardizing overhead lighting would change surgical decisions or reported outcomes.

Terms

  • Anterolateral lighting: light placed in front of and to the sides of the subject.
  • Diffusor box: a translucent enclosure that softens flash light.
  • Likert scale: a rating scale with ordered steps, here five points.
  • Confidence interval: the range within which the true average is likely to fall.
  • Deviation: a nose that bends to one side rather than running straight.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Standard lighting with two flashlight diffusors for pre- and postoperative photography deviates from typical natural lighting and may mask relevant irregularities and deviations of the nose due a decreased contrast. Objective: This study aimed at testing the hypothesis that lighting from above improves the depiction…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Year
2021
Authors
1
Type
Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2021.

  1. ASJ
    2021PMID 33581695Summary
  2. ASJ
    2021PMID 33675636
  3. ASJ
    2021PMID 33590830Full text
  4. ASJ
    2021PMID 33945612Summary
  5. ASJ
    2021PMID 33674857Summary
  6. APS
    2021PMID 34075458Summary
  7. APS
    2021PMID 33598741Summary
  8. APS
    2021PMID 33432387Summary