Rhinogoniometer: Validation of an Instrument for Rhinoplasty
Silva EN, Dos Santos TK, Ferreira LM.
What this paper says
Testing a new surgical protractor in 31 primary rhinoplasty patients, its readings ran 3.7 degrees below computer measurement on average, though within 0.79 degrees for angles up to 75 degrees.
Overview
The position of the tip cartilages affects nasal function. When those cartilages sit too high, the angle between them is usually under 60 degrees, which can leave the nostril opening prone to collapse. The study validated the rhinogoniometer, an instrument for measuring that angle during surgery, against computerized image analysis and tested whether two surgeons obtain the same readings.
Sections of note
- Validation study in 31 primary rhinoplasty patients.
- The angle of divergence, formed between the two outer arms of the tip cartilages, was measured during surgery.
- Rhinogoniometer readings were compared with computerized analysis.
- A significant difference was found between the two methods overall, P equals 0.034.
- On average the instrument read 3.7 degrees smaller than the software.
- Where both methods measured above 75 degrees, the discrepancy between them was larger, P equals 0.022.
- For angles up to 75 degrees, the instrument read on average 0.79 degrees higher than the software.
- Comparing readings between two different surgeons showed a significant difference, P less than 0.023, though the authors state the measurements were reproducible.
What it means for a patient
- The instrument lets a surgeon measure cartilage position during the operation rather than estimating it.
- Accuracy was close to the software reference in the range where the clinical decision matters, under 75 degrees.
- The abstract reports both a significant difference between surgeons and a conclusion that readings are reproducible, which are difficult to reconcile.
- Thirty one patients is a small validation sample.
Why this paper matters
Cartilage malposition is diagnosed by inspection and feel, which varies between surgeons, and the resulting nostril collapse is a common functional complaint. This instrument turns that judgment into a number during surgery. Whether measuring the angle changes surgical decisions or outcomes is not tested.
Terms
- Rhinogoniometer: a surgical instrument for measuring the angle between the tip cartilages.
- Lower lateral cartilages: the paired cartilages forming the nasal tip.
- Cephalic malposition: tip cartilages sitting higher and more sideways than normal.
- Angle of divergence: the angle formed between the two outer arms of the tip cartilages.
- External nasal valve: the nostril opening, which can collapse and block airflow.
- Reproducibility: whether different observers obtain the same measurement.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The position of the lower lateral cartilages is directly related to good nasal functionality. When these cartilages exhibit cephalic malposition, the angle of divergence between cartilages is usually less than 60 degrees, which can cause external nasal valve insufficiency. The objective of this study was to validate…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2021
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2011 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2021.
- PRS Component Restoration in the Bilateral Intermediate Cleft Tip RhinoplastyDang BN, Pfaff MJ, Jain NS et al.2021PMID 34398093Summary
- PRS Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A User-Friendly, Practical Roadmap to the Planning and Execution of Every Rhinoplasty-A 5-Year ReviewRobotti E, Daniel RK, Leone F2021PMID 33835107Summary
- PRS Differences between Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: Indications, Techniques, Grafts, and OutcomesHacker S, Pollock J, Gubisch W et al.2021PMID 34270514Summary
- PRS 2021PMID 33890888
- PRS 2021PMID 34550929
- PRS Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Rhinoplasty: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure SetManahan MA, Fedok F, Davidson C et al.2021PMID 33235037Summary
- PRS Flexible Tongue-in-Groove Technique and Its Effectiveness Compared to Classic Tongue-in-Groove and Columellar Strut Graft Techniques: A Retrospective Analysis of 237 Open Rhinoplasty CasesErdal AI, Genç İG, Pasinlioğlu B et al.2021PMID 34644278Summary
- PRS How Should the Cellphone Be Used to Obtain Good Pictures for Rhinoplasty?Jaber A, Saghir M, Fernandez-Pellon R et al.2021PMID 34233343