Aerosol and Droplet Generation from Open Rhinoplasty: Surgical Risk in the Pandemic Era
Ye MJ, Campiti VJ, Falls M, Howser LA, Sharma D, Vadhul RB, Burgin SJ, Illing EA, Ting JY, Koehler KR, Park JH, Vernon DJ, Nesemeier BR, Johnson JD, Shipchandler TZ.
What this paper says
Testing rhinoplasty steps on human anatomic specimens, no visible droplets were produced by any technique, and airborne particles rose only with electrocautery and endonasal rasping.
Overview
The COVID-19 pandemic raised concern that head and neck operations, including cosmetic facial surgery, could spread infection through droplets or aerosols. The authors set out to measure which rhinoplasty steps actually generate them. Noses of human anatomic specimens were infiltrated with 0.1 percent fluorescein, a dye visible under ultraviolet light, and particles were counted with an optical particle sizer during each technique.
Sections of note
- Design: laboratory study on human anatomic specimens, not living patients.
- Techniques tested: opening the skin and soft tissue envelope, monopolar electrocautery, endonasal rasping, endonasal osteotomy and percutaneous osteotomy.
- Negative control for comparison: anterior rhinoscopy.
- No visible droplet contamination was observed under ultraviolet light for any technique tested.
- Total aerosols in the 0.300 to 10.000 micrometer range increased after monopolar electrocautery, p less than 0.001, and endonasal rasp, p equal to 0.003.
- Opening the soft tissue envelope, endonasal osteotomy and percutaneous osteotomy produced no detectable aerosol increase, p greater than 0.15.
What it means for a patient
- Most steps of a rhinoplasty did not produce measurable airborne particles in this model.
- The two steps that did, electric cautery and rasping bone through the nose, both involve heat or high speed friction.
- This was a cadaveric model with dye, not live patients, and it measured particles rather than any actual virus.
- The findings inform protective equipment decisions for the surgical team. They say nothing about the patient's own risk or outcome.
Why this paper matters
Elective facial surgery was suspended widely during the pandemic on the assumption that nasal procedures were high risk. Measuring which specific steps generate aerosols allows precautions to be targeted rather than applied to the whole operation. Whether aerosol counts translate to actual transmission risk was not measured.
Terms
- Aerosol: particles small enough to stay suspended in air for a period.
- Droplet: a larger particle that falls quickly onto nearby surfaces.
- Fluorescein: a dye that glows under ultraviolet light, used to make spatter visible.
- Monopolar electrocautery: an instrument that uses electric current to cut and seal tissue.
- Endonasal rasping: filing bone through an incision inside the nose.
- Osteotomy: a planned cut or controlled fracture of bone.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to concerns over transmission risk from head and neck operations including facial cosmetic surgeries. Objectives: To quantify droplet and aerosol generation from rhinoplasty techniques in a human anatomic specimen model using fluorescein staining and an optical particle…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.
Journal archive by topic
Every topic opens with what the literature says, cited line by line to PubMed.
Papers from 2024
Every paper in the archive published the same year.
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Papers in the archive from this journal, 2020 to 2026.
Related papers
Same journal, 2024.
- FPSAM Artificial Intelligence Versus Expert Plastic Surgeon: Comparative Study Shows ChatGPT "Wins" Rhinoplasty Consultations: Should We Be Worried?Durairaj KK, Baker O, Bertossi D et al.2024PMID 37982677Summary
- FPSAM Augmented Virtual Examination for Cosmetic and Functional RhinoplastyShomorony A, Weitzman R, Chen YH et al.2024PMID 37358622Summary
- FPSAM Before and After Rhinoplasty Photography on Online PlatformsGoshtasbi K, Kim D, Wong BJF2024PMID 38197856
- FPSAM 2024PMID 38502837Summary
- FPSAM Commentary on: Decreased Filler Volumes with Repeat Micro-Liquid Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty SessionsCotofana S2024PMID 39166301
- FPSAM 2024PMID 38648529Summary
- FPSAM Decreased Filler Volumes with Repeat Micro-Liquid Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty SessionsMoubayed SP, Khoury M2024PMID 39591585
- FPSAM Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Using a Ferreira-Nakamura Spare Roof Technique B Highlighting the Low Septal Cartilage StripNakamura F, Ferreira MG, Rodrigues de Oliveira GS et al.2024PMID 39087910Summary