rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · 2022

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2022

Current Practices in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty

Fisher M, Alba B, Ahmad J, Robotti E, Cerkes N, Gruber RP, Rohrich RJ, Bradley JP, Tanna N.

What this paper says

A review of the materials used to build up a deficient nasal bridge, covering the patient's own cartilage and bone, donor rib and processed donor skin, and artificial implants.

Overview

Dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty addresses both appearance and breathing problems caused by a low nasal bridge. It can be done with a variety of techniques and grafting materials, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages. The article provides a detailed overview of the available materials, their uses, risks and benefits.

Sections of note

  • Review article; the abstract reports no patient numbers, no rates and no follow up.
  • The patient's own graft materials include septal cartilage, ear cartilage and rib cartilage.
  • Those donor sites can provide cartilage either as a single solid block or diced.
  • Bone may be used when strong structural stability is required.
  • Soft tissue may be used to fill mild to moderate defects.
  • Donor grafts, including irradiated and non irradiated rib, and processed donor skin are alternatives with similar advantages and no need for a second surgical site.
  • Artificial implants may be used successfully provided both patient and surgeon understand the associated risks.
  • The stated conclusion is that surgeons should be familiar with the full range of materials and their risks and uses.

What it means for a patient

  • The main trade off is between using the patient's own tissue, which requires a second incision, and donor or artificial material, which does not.
  • Bone is reserved for cases needing maximum rigidity; soft tissue only for minor deficiencies.
  • Artificial implants are presented as workable but conditional on the patient understanding their specific risks.
  • No rates, comparisons or outcome data are reported in the abstract.

Why this paper matters

Material choice determines the durability of a bridge augmentation and whether the patient carries a second scar, and there is no consensus on which is best. This review lays out the options side by side. It does not rank them on measured outcomes.

Terms

  • Dorsal augmentation: raising the height of the nasal bridge.
  • Autologous graft: tissue taken from the patient's own body.
  • Homologous graft: tissue from a deceased donor, processed for surgical use.
  • Acellular dermal matrix: processed donor skin with the cells removed.
  • Alloplastic implant: an artificial, manufactured implant material.
  • En bloc: as a single solid piece rather than in fragments.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty addresses the aesthetic and functional impairments caused by a deficient nasal dorsum. Augmentation rhinoplasty can be performed using a variety of different surgical techniques and grafting materials that all have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Methods: Grafting materials have…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
9
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. ASJ
    2022PMID 34546291
  2. ASJ
    2022PMID 34436559Summary
  3. APS
    Closed Piezo Preservation Rhinoplasty
    Almazov I, Rovira RV, Farhadov V
    2022PMID 35169916Summary
  4. APS
    2022PMID 35299264
  5. APS
    2022PMID 33987697Summary
  6. APS
    2022PMID 35112156Summary
  7. CPS
    2022PMID 34782143Summary
  8. FPSAM
    2022PMID 35559727