rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · 2024

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2024

The Blocking Points: The Keys to Consistent Success in Preservation Rhinoplasty

Goksel A, Cason RW, Tran KN, Rohrich RJ.

What this paper says

The authors name seven anatomical points that resist lowering the nasal bridge in preservation rhinoplasty, expanding a previously described list of five, and argue each must be released to stop the hump coming back.

Overview

Dorsal preservation keeps the middle of the nose intact and changes appearance by altering the bony pyramid and the septum beneath. Its distinctive failure mode is hump recurrence. The authors attribute this to blocking points, tissues under tension that either stop the bridge from going down during surgery or push it back up to its original convexity over the following months.

Sections of note

  • Article type: technique and anatomy article. No patient numbers, recurrence rates or follow up data are reported.
  • Five blocking points had previously been described; the authors add two more for a total of seven.
  • The seven are: the cartilaginous septum, the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid, the lateral osteotomy site, the Webster triangle, the internal mucoperiosteum of the maxillary bone, the medial canthal ligament, and the lateral keystone area.
  • Stated requirement: the surgeon must know which points matter for the technique chosen and address them methodically. No data on how often each point causes recurrence is given.

What it means for a patient

  • Hump recurrence is the recognized weakness of preservation rhinoplasty, and this article explains why it happens mechanically.
  • The bridge does not stay down simply because it was pushed down. Surrounding attachments pull it back unless they are released.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It reports no recurrence rates and does not show that addressing all seven points prevents recurrence.
  • Two of the seven points are newly proposed here and have not been independently confirmed.

Why this paper matters

Preservation rhinoplasty spread quickly, and audits of published photographs have found residual and recurrent humps as its most common flaw. Naming the anatomical causes turns a vague failure into a checklist. Whether following that checklist actually lowers recurrence rates is untested.

Terms

  • Dorsal preservation: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
  • Midvault: the middle third of the nose, formed by the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
  • Perpendicular plate of the ethmoid: the thin bone forming the upper rear part of the septum.
  • Webster triangle: a small triangle of bone at the base of the nose near the nostril.
  • Mucoperiosteum: the lining tissue attached to the surface of bone.
  • Medial canthal ligament: the ligament anchoring the inner corner of the eyelids to the nasal bone.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Preservation rhinoplasty is a growing area of interest among rhinoplasty surgeons. Dorsal preservation-a tenet of preservation rhinoplasty-is predicated on maintaining the integrity of the nasal midvault and effecting aesthetic change through alterations to the bony nasal pyramid and underlying septum. A challenge…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
4
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  2. APS
    2024PMID 38587673
  3. APS
    2024PMID 38839611Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 38483551Summary
  5. FPS
    2024PMID 38733998
  6. FPS
    2024PMID 38471660Summary
  7. FPSAM
    2024PMID 38648529Summary
  8. FPSAM
    2024PMID 39087910Summary