Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2025
Precision Rhinoplasty Cylindric Burrs-Sidewall Aesthetics
Ilhan E, Arancibia-Tagle D, Özay H, Carlos Neves J.
What this paper says
A technique article on using cylindrical powered burrs to reshape the bony bridge and side walls of the nose, applicable whether preservation or structural rhinoplasty is performed.
Overview
Powered instruments have changed bone work in rhinoplasty, shortening operating time, reducing damage to surrounding soft tissue and allowing more precise bone modification than manual rasps. The authors describe applications of cylindrical burrs to the upper and middle thirds of the bridge and to the side walls, and state the approach works with either surgical philosophy.
Sections of note
- Article type: technique description. No patient numbers, outcomes or complication rates are reported.
- Stated advantages of powered instruments over manual rasps: reduced operating time, less soft tissue damage, and greater precision.
- Burr application one: creating a smooth transition between the side of the nose and the face.
- Burr application two: treating bony asymmetries.
- Burr application three: producing homogeneous upper and middle thirds that blend into the upper lateral cartilages.
- The technique is stated to apply regardless of whether dorsal preservation or a structural technique is used.
- The authors describe combining burrs with piezo osteotomy.
What it means for a patient
- The transition from the side of the nose to the cheek is where a step or ridge is most visible after bone work, and burring smooths it rather than cutting it.
- Powered instruments remove bone gradually, which allows small corrections that a chisel cannot make.
- Because the technique reshapes bone rather than fracturing it, it applies to both schools of rhinoplasty.
- The abstract carries no findings. It reports no patient numbers, outcomes or complication data, and the claimed advantages are stated rather than measured.
Why this paper matters
Visible irregularities along the side walls and the bone to cartilage junction are a common source of dissatisfaction and revision. Powered burrs allow gradual reshaping where traditional instruments break bone. Whether burring produces fewer visible irregularities than conventional rasping has not been measured.
Terms
- Burr: a rotating powered cutting tip used to shave and shape bone.
- Rasp: a hand held file used to smooth bone.
- Piezo osteotomy: cutting bone with an ultrasonic instrument that spares soft tissue.
- Lateral nasal sidewall: the side surface of the nose between the bridge and the cheek.
- Upper lateral cartilages: the paired cartilages forming the middle third of the nose.
- Dorsal preservation: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The development of power instruments has led to great advances in rhinoplasty. It has helped to reduce operating time, minimize damage to the surrounding soft tissues, and allow precision bony modification compared with the use of manual rasps. Burrs help ensure precise results by (i) creating a smooth transition…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Bridging the Gap in Rhinoplasty Training: The Effectiveness of 3D Printed Models in Surgical EducationRehman U, Polglase N, Kahn D et al.2025PMID 40129179Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ In-House Virtual Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Reconstructive RhinoplastyRubio-Palau J, Gonçalves J, Malet-Contreras A et al.2025PMID 39161317Summary
- ASJ One Profile to Rule Them All? A Neural Network Analysis of the Homogenizing Effect of Primary RhinoplastyKhaw KL, Lu SM2025PMID 40501168Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- APS A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft RhinoplastyXia Y, Yuan J, Wang Z et al.2025PMID 39572464Summary
- APS Algorithm for the Treatment of Tip Malformation Combining a Clinical Qualitative Assessment and Specific Closed-Rhinoplasty Techniques Based on Retrospective Analysis of Pellegrini's Fellows 40 Years' ExperienceScattolin A, D'Ascanio L, Galzignato PF et al.2025PMID 39187588Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary