rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · 2025

PRS-GO Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2025

Use of Lacrimal Retractor in Rhinoplasty: A Boon for the Solo Rhinoplasty Surgeon

Graham DA.

What this paper says

The author describes using a spring-loaded eyelid retractor to hold the tip cartilages apart during open rhinoplasty, freeing both of the surgeon's hands when operating without an assistant.

Overview

Open rhinoplasty requires exposing multiple structures, and many surgeons still use a bidirectional cartilage-splitting approach that requires holding the lower tip cartilages apart at the midline while working on the septum. Current methods require an assistant holding hooks, or weighted hooks left to fall sideways. For septal exposure the surgeon often holds a speculum in one hand while dissecting with the other.

Sections of note

  • Article type: instrument technique description. No patient numbers, outcomes or complication rates are reported.
  • The device is a spring-loaded lacrimal retractor, normally used in tear duct surgery.
  • Stated uses: dissecting the nasal tip, and exposing the bridge and lower septum for modification.
  • Stated advantage: constant and predictable retracting force on the midline cartilages.
  • Stated advantage: atraumatic to the tissue.
  • Stated advantage, described as most important: the operating surgeon can use both hands.
  • The author states the technique could benefit both structural and preservation rhinoplasty surgeons.

What it means for a patient

  • This concerns how the operation is performed rather than what is done to the nose, and does not change the surgical plan.
  • Steady rather than variable retraction reduces the chance of tearing the cartilage being held.
  • The practical driver is surgeons operating without an assistant, which is common in office based practice.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It reports no patient numbers, outcomes or comparison against existing methods.

Why this paper matters

Exposure determines what a surgeon can see and therefore what can be done accurately, and inadequate retraction is a routine practical obstacle rather than a theoretical one. Repurposing an existing instrument requires no new equipment. Whether it improves accuracy, shortens operating time or reduces cartilage damage is untested.

Terms

  • Open rhinoplasty: surgery through an external incision on the strip between the nostrils.
  • Lacrimal retractor: a small spring-loaded instrument used in tear duct surgery to hold tissue apart.
  • Lower lateral cartilages: the paired cartilages forming the nasal tip and nostril rims.
  • Cartilage-splitting approach: an exposure method dividing the tip cartilages to reach the structures beneath.
  • Nasal speculum: a hand held instrument that opens the nostril for viewing.
  • Caudal septum: the front lower edge of the wall dividing the two sides of the nose.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Open rhinoplasty is a complex procedure that requires precise exposure of multiple anatomic structures. Anatomic dissection typically proceeds from the tip cephalad to the dorsum. Although newer open rhinoplasty techniques exist, many surgeons still perform a bidirectional cartilage-splitting approach. This approach requires precise exposure of the septum while retracting the lower lateral cartilages at their midline. This retraction facilitates tip and dorsum dissection and allows adequate visualization of the septum for modification. Current lower lateral cartilage retraction techniques require either surgical assistants to hold hooks or clamps, or the solo surgeon to use weighted hooks or clamps that are simply allowed to fall laterally, thus providing exposure. Furthermore, for septal exposure, the surgeon often must use a nasal speculum in 1 hand while attempting to dissect and modify the septum with the other. In this article, the author described the technique of using a spring-loaded lacrimal retractor to facilitate dissection of the nasal tip, as well as to provide exposure for dorsal and caudal septal modification. This technique provides a constant and predictable retracting force to the midline cartilages; is atraumatic; and, most importantly, allows the operating surgeon to use both hands while performing the operation. The technical advantages of using such a device could serve as a boon to both structural and preservation rhinoplasty surgeons.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Year
2025
Authors
1
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

This paper sits outside the 16 topic groups; the archive holds every paper by journal and year.

Related papers

Same journal, 2025.

  1. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 39911533Summary
  2. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 41158592Summary
  3. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 40469545Summary
  4. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 40765688Full text
  5. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 40092501Summary
  6. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 41282447Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 40416407Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    2025PMID 40771258Summary