Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2025
Triangular Fossa Cartilage Graft in Rhinoplasty: A Three-Dimensional Anatomical and Technical Feasibility Study
Huang CJ, Yen CI, Chang CS, Chen HC, Yang SY, Chang SY, Hsiao YC.
What this paper says
Harvesting an extra piece of ear cartilage from the triangular fossa through the same incision as a conchal graft caused no significant change in ear height, width or bowl dimensions across 15 donor sites.
Overview
Rhinoplasty needs a stable framework, and conchal cartilage from the bowl of the ear is commonly used but often insufficient in volume, particularly in revision cases. The authors describe harvesting the triangular fossa cartilage at the same time, through the same incision behind the ear, to increase available graft material without creating another donor site.
Sections of note
- Design: retrospective analysis of 14 patients, 15 ear donor sites, assessed with three dimensional imaging.
- Three groups compared: conchal cartilage only; conchal plus triangular fossa without preserving the helix crux; and conchal plus triangular fossa with it preserved.
- Three dimensional analysis showed no significant differences in ear height, width or conchal cavity dimensions.
- A mild reduction in triangular fossa area was observed but produced no visible deformity or functional problem.
- Preserving the helix crux maintained the natural curvature of the antihelix, keeping the donor site stable.
- Stated application: cases needing additional cartilage, particularly revision rhinoplasty. The authors state longer follow up and patient reported outcomes are needed.
What it means for a patient
- Running out of ear cartilage usually means moving to rib, which requires a chest incision, and this technique adds volume without that.
- The ear kept its measured shape, with only the triangular fossa itself slightly reduced and not visibly so.
- Preserving one specific ridge, the helix crux, was what kept the ear's curve intact, so the technique detail matters.
- Limits: 14 patients, retrospective, no patient reported outcomes, and no data on how the harvested cartilage performed in the nose.
Why this paper matters
Graft supply is the practical constraint in revision rhinoplasty, and each additional donor site adds pain and scarring. Extending an existing harvest through the same incision is the least costly way to add material. Whether triangular fossa cartilage behaves like conchal cartilage once implanted is not addressed.
Terms
- Concha: the bowl shaped hollow of the outer ear, a common cartilage donor site.
- Triangular fossa: a small triangular hollow in the upper part of the outer ear.
- Helix crux: the ridge where the ear's outer rim crosses into the conchal bowl.
- Antihelix: the curved ridge inside the outer rim of the ear.
- Autogenous graft: tissue taken from the patient's own body.
- Donor site morbidity: pain, scarring or complications where tissue was harvested.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Aesthetic rhinoplasty relies on a stable framework for long-term structural integrity, often requiring autogenous cartilage grafts. While conchal cartilage is commonly used, its volume may be insufficient, particularly in secondary or revision rhinoplasty. This study presents a novel technique for simultaneous…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
242 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Bridging the Gap in Rhinoplasty Training: The Effectiveness of 3D Printed Models in Surgical EducationRehman U, Polglase N, Kahn D et al.2025PMID 40129179Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ In-House Virtual Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Reconstructive RhinoplastyRubio-Palau J, Gonçalves J, Malet-Contreras A et al.2025PMID 39161317Summary
- ASJ One Profile to Rule Them All? A Neural Network Analysis of the Homogenizing Effect of Primary RhinoplastyKhaw KL, Lu SM2025PMID 40501168Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Single-Stage Alar Nostril Ring Correction Using Auricular Composite Grafts in Reconstructive RhinoplastySazgar AA, Sazgar AK, Hatami N et al.2025PMID 39676167Summary
- APS A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft RhinoplastyXia Y, Yuan J, Wang Z et al.2025PMID 39572464Summary
- APS Algorithm for the Treatment of Tip Malformation Combining a Clinical Qualitative Assessment and Specific Closed-Rhinoplasty Techniques Based on Retrospective Analysis of Pellegrini's Fellows 40 Years' ExperienceScattolin A, D'Ascanio L, Galzignato PF et al.2025PMID 39187588Summary