rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2026

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2026

Clarification and Classification of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: Lessons from a Continuous 1,191-Case Experience

Saban Y, Sachanandani NS.

What this paper says

Over 1,191 consecutive primary rhinoplasties by Yves Saban from 2010 to 2024, revision rates went from 3.4% to 9.9% to 3.3% as indications were first tested, then over-expanded, then consolidated into a classification system.

Overview

Saban is the surgeon most associated with modern dorsal preservation. He and Sachanandani reviewed his 1,191 consecutive primary cases in three periods: 2010-2014 (n = 320) introducing push-down and let-down in selected cases; 2015-2019 (n = 352) expanding to complex noses; 2020-2024 (n = 519) applying a unified framework. Revision rates were compared.

Sections of note

  • Series 1: 11 revisions (3.4%), showing feasibility in favourable cases.
  • Series 2: 35 revisions (9.9%) during "uncontrolled expansion of indications."
  • Series 3: 17 revisions (3.3%) after refined patient selection and decision-making.
  • The difference across series was significant (chi-squared 21.61, p < 0.001).
  • The third series produced a pyramidal classification with named septoplasty "modulators" and W-point septoplasty.

What it means for a patient

  • Even the originator's revision rate tripled when preservation was applied to noses it did not suit, then fell back once selection rules were set.
  • Around 1 in 30 patients needed revision in the mature series.
  • A surgeon's case selection matters as much as the technique.

Why this paper matters

It is the largest single-surgeon preservation series and openly documents a learning curve, with a proposed unified terminology. Limits: retrospective, single surgeon, revision as the only outcome reported in the abstract.

Terms

  • Push-down / let-down: preservation osteotomy methods that lower the bony vault by impaction or by removing a strip of bone at its base.
  • Pyramidal classification: the authors' scheme grouping noses by how the bony-cartilaginous pyramid should be handled.
  • Septoplasty modulator: a named septal manoeuvre that controls how far and where the dorsum drops.
  • W-point: the junction on the septum where the upper lateral cartilages diverge, used as a landmark for septal cuts.
  • U-shaped learning curve: outcomes worsen before improving as a technique matures.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) has attracted significant attention in recent years. However, the rapid dissemination of diverse techniques and terminology has generated confusion regarding definition, indications, methodology, and outcomes. A unified conceptual framework remains lacking. Methods: We…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2026
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2026.

  1. ASJ
    2026PMID 42415377Summary
  2. ASJ
    2026PMID 42013314Summary
  3. ASJ
    2026PMID 41369038Summary
  4. ASJ
    2026PMID 42455864Summary
  5. APS
    2026PMID 41998166Summary
  6. APS
    2026PMID 40855022Summary
  7. APS
    2026PMID 42414641
  8. APS
    2026PMID 42418006Summary