Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2025
Preventing Hump Recurrence in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: The 5 Key Tenets
Cason RW, Goksel A, Sergesketter AR, Cotofana S, Rohrich RJ.
What this paper says
The authors set out five principles for preventing the hump from coming back after dorsal preservation, which they state is the most common complication of the technique and often requires further surgery.
Overview
Dorsal preservation keeps the natural joint between bone and cartilage on the bridge, achieving change instead through the septal cartilage beneath and the surrounding bony pyramid. Its distinctive complication is hump recurrence, where tension in the tissue or the memory of the cartilage restores the original convexity. The article presents the senior author's five principles for preventing it.
Sections of note
- Article type: technique and principles article. No patient numbers, recurrence rates or outcome data are reported.
- Stated context: hump recurrence is the most common complication after dorsal preservation and often requires revision surgery.
- Tenet one: appropriate patient selection.
- Tenet two: addressing anatomic blocking points, the tissues that resist lowering.
- Tenet three: adding mechanical fixation of the cartilage vault with sutures, scaled to how much the septum was manipulated.
- Tenet four: a graduated approach to choosing which preservation procedure to perform.
- Tenet five: ancillary measures to control the shape of the bridge.
- The authors state implementing all five is crucial to reducing recurrence.
What it means for a patient
- Preservation rhinoplasty can leave the hump returning months later, and this is the recognized trade off against its advantages.
- Patient selection heads the list, meaning not every nose is a candidate for the technique.
- Mechanical fixation with sutures addresses the physical cause: cartilage under tension springs back unless held.
- The abstract carries no findings. It reports no recurrence rates and does not show that following the five tenets prevents recurrence.
Why this paper matters
Published audits of preservation rhinoplasty photographs have found residual and recurrent humps as the most frequent flaw, so a structured prevention framework addresses the technique's central weakness. Codifying it makes the reasoning transferable between surgeons. Whether the framework lowers recurrence rates in practice remains untested.
Terms
- Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
- Hump recurrence: the bump on the bridge returning after it was lowered.
- Osseocartilaginous joint: the junction where nasal bone meets cartilage.
- Blocking point: tissue under tension that resists lowering of the bridge or pushes it back up.
- Cartilaginous vault: the cartilage framework forming the middle third of the nose.
- Revision surgery: a further operation to correct the result of an earlier one.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Preservation rhinoplasty has re-emerged over the past decade and continues to gain traction in the rhinoplasty community. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR), one of the tenets of preservation rhinoplasty, centers on preservation of the native osseocartilaginous joint of the dorsum, with changes instead achieved…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced PrecisionGuilarte R, Malzone G2025PMID 39812015Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- APS A New Tool to Determine the Accurate Lateral Osteotomy Line in Rhinoplasty with PiezosurgeryGuliyev M2025PMID 38926251Full text
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary