rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · 2025

FPS Clin Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · 2025

The Cottle Method and Modifications in Preservation Rhinoplasty

Friedman O, Ulloa FL.

What this paper says

A review of the historic Cottle rhinoplasty technique and the modifications the authors add to it, including techniques borrowed from structural rhinoplasty, which they state give more predictable results.

Overview

Preservation rhinoplasty has gained popularity recently but represents a long standing approach used for generations. The authors review the relevant history of the Cottle technique and then describe modifications they routinely incorporate to improve on Cottle's original push-down and let-down. Those modifications include spreader grafts and rhinocontouring, both drawn from structural rhinoplasty.

Sections of note

  • Article type: historical review and technique description. No patient numbers or outcome data are reported.
  • Stated context: preservation is not new but a revival of a long established approach.
  • The original technique described is Cottle's push-down and let-down.
  • Modifications named: spreader grafts and rhinocontouring, both borrowed from structural rhinoplasty.
  • Stated result of the modifications: more predictable outcomes.
  • The article presents the authors' preferred modifications rather than a systematic comparison.
  • No complication rates, follow up or measured results appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Preservation rhinoplasty is often presented as new, but the underlying operation dates back decades and is being revived with additions.
  • Borrowing structural techniques such as spreader grafts means the two schools are being combined rather than kept apart.
  • Predictability is the stated aim, which is the practical problem with the original technique.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It reports no numbers, outcomes or comparison against the unmodified technique.

Why this paper matters

Understanding why the original Cottle technique fell out of use, and what has changed, is central to judging whether the current revival is different or a repetition. Documenting the specific modifications makes that assessable. Whether they deliver the claimed predictability is not demonstrated here.

Terms

  • Cottle technique: the original mid twentieth century push-down method of lowering the bridge.
  • Push-down and let-down: lowering the bridge by sinking it or by removing a bone wedge first.
  • Preservation rhinoplasty: reshaping that keeps native nasal structures intact.
  • Spreader graft: a cartilage strip placed alongside the septum to hold the breathing valve open.
  • Rhinocontouring: reshaping the surface of the nose with powered instruments.
  • Structural rhinoplasty: the approach that divides and rebuilds the framework with grafts and sutures.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Preservation rhinoplasty has gained much popularity in recent years, but represents a fundamental long-standing approach that has been used for generations. We review some of the relevant history of the "Cottle Rhinoplasty technique," as well as a number of modifications we often incorporate into the operation to…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
Year
2025
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2025.

  1. ASJ
    2025PMID 39876773Summary
  2. ASJ
    2025PMID 39498873Summary
  3. ASJ
    2025PMID 39812015Summary
  4. ASJ
    2025PMID 40179243Summary
  5. ASJ
    2025PMID 40972537Summary
  6. APS
    2025PMID 39117869Summary
  7. APS
    2025PMID 40195129Summary
  8. APS
    2025PMID 40195130Summary