Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2025
Expanding Indications to Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty
Ferraz MBJ, Sella GCP, Pandini F, Greco R, Donato AOG.
What this paper says
A review stating that dorsal preservation, once limited to thin regular bridges with strong cartilage, now extends to wider and irregular bridges through instruments such as piezoelectric devices.
Overview
Dorsal preservation modifies the bridge without disrupting the keystone area, where nasal bone meets cartilage. The authors contrast it with traditional methods that require rebuilding the middle vault after the hump is removed. Preservation keeps that structural continuity, reduces the need for grafts, and is stated to minimize long term irregularities.
Sections of note
- Article type: narrative review, part of a clinics series. No patient numbers or outcome data are reported.
- Stated mechanism: the technique modifies the bridge without disrupting the keystone area.
- Stated contrast: traditional methods require reconstruction of the middle vault.
- Stated advantages: preserved structural continuity, fewer grafts needed, and fewer long term irregularities.
- Ideal candidates: patients with a thin, regular bridge and strong cartilage.
- Advances in tools such as piezoelectric instruments have widened applicability to wider and irregular bridges.
- The technique involves precise modifications to both the nose and the septum.
- Stated trend: preservation is increasingly favored for efficiency, improved outcomes and adaptability to diverse anatomy.
What it means for a patient
- Conventional hump removal opens the roof of the nose, which must then be rebuilt; preservation avoids that step entirely.
- The set of noses considered suitable has widened because instruments now allow bone to be reshaped rather than only fractured.
- Fewer grafts means less cartilage harvested, which matters when septal supply is limited.
- The abstract carries no findings. Claims of improved outcomes and fewer irregularities are stated without data.
Why this paper matters
Preservation rhinoplasty was long restricted to a narrow set of straightforward noses, and how far that boundary can move is the field's current question. Attributing the expansion to instrumentation rather than to technique alone identifies what actually changed. Whether results in these newly included patients match those in ideal candidates is unaddressed.
Terms
- Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
- Keystone area: where the nasal bones meet the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
- Middle vault: the middle third of the nose, formed by the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
- Piezoelectric instrument: an ultrasonic device that cuts bone while sparing soft tissue.
- Indication: the circumstance in which a technique is considered appropriate.
- Contour irregularity: a visible or palpable bump, dip or edge on the surface of the nose.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Dorsal preservation (DP) rhinoplasty is a surgical technique designed to modify the nasal dorsum without disrupting the keystone area, offering a natural and long-lasting outcome. Unlike traditional methods that require reconstruction of the middle vault, DP preserves structural continuity, reduces the need for…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced PrecisionGuilarte R, Malzone G2025PMID 39812015Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- APS A New Tool to Determine the Accurate Lateral Osteotomy Line in Rhinoplasty with PiezosurgeryGuliyev M2025PMID 38926251Full text
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary