Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2025
Refining Patient Selection in Hybrid Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Review of 50 Patients
Ganesh Kumar N, Sherif R, Rohrich RJ.
What this paper says
After reviewing 50 consecutive hybrid rhinoplasties, the authors present an algorithm for deciding when and how to apply dorsal preservation, warning that using it in unfavorable cases destabilizes the nose.
Overview
Dorsal preservation means keeping the middle vault intact, and it can be combined with open structural tip surgery as a hybrid approach. The authors state implementing it requires careful patient selection, since applying it to unsuitable noses can destabilize both the framework and nasal function. They reviewed 50 consecutive hybrid cases and derived a selection algorithm from that experience.
Sections of note
- Article type: summary review with a proposed algorithm. Level of evidence therapeutic V.
- 50 consecutive patients undergoing hybrid rhinoplasty using dorsal preservation were reviewed.
- Stated risk: preservation in unfavorable cases has destabilizing effects on the nasal framework and function.
- The algorithm covers both when to perform preservation and how, incorporating both the bony and cartilaginous components.
- Stated aim: simplifying the technique and improving outcomes in selected patients.
- The abstract does not state the criteria the algorithm uses.
- No complication rates, revision rates, satisfaction scores or follow up length appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- Preservation is not suitable for every nose, and the stated consequence of applying it wrongly is a less stable nose that may breathe worse.
- Both the bone and cartilage parts of the bridge factor into the decision, so the assessment is not a single measurement.
- The abstract carries no findings. It reports no outcomes from the 50 patients, only that an algorithm was derived from them.
- Level V is the lowest evidence grade, reflecting expert opinion drawn from experience.
Why this paper matters
Preservation rhinoplasty is being applied to widening indications, and audits of published photographs have found recurring flaws, which makes selection criteria the practical question. Deriving an algorithm from a consecutive series is a reasonable starting point. Whether following it improves outcomes has not been tested.
Terms
- Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: keeping the middle of the bridge intact while lowering it.
- Mid-vault: the middle third of the nose, formed by the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
- Hybrid approach: combining preservation of the bridge with structural rebuilding of the tip.
- Patient selection: deciding which patients are suitable candidates for a technique.
- Algorithm: a fixed decision sequence applied to each case.
- Nasal framework: the bone and cartilage structure holding the nose in shape.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) refers to the preservation of the nasal mid-vault during rhinoplasty. It can be performed in conjunction with open structural tip rhinoplasty as a hybrid approach to rhinoplasty. Implementing DPR requires careful patient selection to optimize outcomes, as DPR in unfavorable cases…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced PrecisionGuilarte R, Malzone G2025PMID 39812015Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- APS A New Tool to Determine the Accurate Lateral Osteotomy Line in Rhinoplasty with PiezosurgeryGuliyev M2025PMID 38926251Full text
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary