Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · 2025
Preservation Rhinoplasty Performed Simultaneously with Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: Last Evolution in Orthofacial Surgery
Raffaini M, Arcuri F.
What this paper says
Across 118 patients who had jaw repositioning surgery and preservation rhinoplasty in the same operation, the combined procedure averaged 207 minutes with complications in 12.7 percent.
Overview
Jaw repositioning surgery changes the shape and support of the nose, so combining it with rhinoplasty in one operation is attractive. The authors state very few studies have examined doing preservation rhinoplasty simultaneously. They retrospectively reviewed all patients with malocclusion who had both operations together at a single centre in Parma between January 2018 and December 2022.
Sections of note
- Design: retrospective single centre study. Level of evidence IV.
- 118 patients after exclusions: 41 men and 77 women, mean age 22 years, range 17 to 38.
- Preservation subtypes were classified: type 1 full let down, type 2 bone scoring plus full let down, type 3 bone scoring plus basal osteotomies plus cartilage let down, type 4 bone scoring plus cartilage let down, type 5 bone scoring plus upper cartilage rim resection.
- Distribution: type 1 in 29, type 2 in 34, type 3 in 27, type 4 in 16, type 5 in 12.
- Mean duration of the complete combined procedure: 207 minutes, range 170 to 220.
- 15 complication events occurred, 12.7 percent.
- Stated conclusion: simultaneous jaw surgery and preservation rhinoplasty is a viable option.
What it means for a patient
- Doing both at once means a single anesthetic and a single recovery rather than two operations months apart.
- The combined procedure took around three and a half hours, which is not dramatically longer than either operation alone.
- Complications occurred in roughly one in eight patients, though the abstract does not say what they were or which operation caused them.
- Limits: retrospective, single centre, no comparison against staged operations, and no aesthetic or breathing outcomes reported.
Why this paper matters
Jaw surgery alters the nasal base directly, so operating on the nose afterward means working on anatomy that has just changed. Combining them addresses that sequencing problem. Whether results match staged surgery, and what the 12.7 percent of complications consisted of, is unaddressed.
Terms
- Orthognathic surgery: surgery to reposition the jaws.
- Bimaxillary: involving both the upper and lower jaw.
- Malocclusion: a mismatch in how the upper and lower teeth meet.
- Preservation rhinoplasty: reshaping that keeps native nasal structures intact.
- Let-down: removing a wedge of bone from the side walls so the bridge settles lower.
- Bone scoring: making shallow cuts in bone to allow it to bend or reshape.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Since 2018, we have begun to perform preservation rhinoplasty (PR). To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have evaluated simultaneous orthognathic surgery and PR. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess the safety, efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of PR performed at the time as OS.…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced PrecisionGuilarte R, Malzone G2025PMID 39812015Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary
- APS Double-Tunnel Creation in Mucoperichondrial-Mucoperiosteal Septal Flap to Preserve the Sagittal Stability of Dorsal Components in RhinoplastyRajaee A, Tajik N, Karimi-Galougahi M2025PMID 40195130Summary